Placed on agenda for telechat - 2015-03-05
ID Tracker URL: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-introduction/
___
lisp mailing list
lisp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
IESG state changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
ID Tracker URL: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-introduction/
___
lisp mailing list
lisp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
Hi,
I read the draft and I think it is ready to be handed to the AD.
Regards,
-Lori
On 01/29/2015 05:36 PM, Luigi Iannone wrote:
Hi All,
The authors of draft-ietf-lisp-ddt-02
[http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-ddt-02],
as well as several active WG participants,
requested the WG
IANA review state changed to IANA OK - No Actions Needed
ID Tracker URL: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-introduction/
___
lisp mailing list
lisp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational
aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call
may be
I will leave most of these for the authors to comment on.
With regard to your question about incremental deployment, that is the
domain of the LISP Deployment document, and was deliberately only
lightly covered here. I am not sure what we can do to address your
comment without duplicating
Joel,
Thanks for the quick response.
On incremental deployment, a few sentences on the role/usage of PITRs and
PETRs in incremental deployment plus considerations for how both EIDs and
fully routable IPv4 and IPv6 addresses can be used as destination addresses
from the same LISP host would be
