Re: [lisp] Comments to draft-ietf-lisp-yang-10

Thanks Dino. I'll discuss with the authors and will get back to you. On 2018-11-05, 5:47 PM, "lisp on behalf of Dino Farinacci" wrote: Reshad, here are my comments. For every occurence of “virtual-networks” change to “vpns”. For every occurence of “virtual-network” change

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf

I agree that this document is ready to be handed to the AD. From: lisp on behalf of Luigi Iannone Date: Friday, July 6, 2018 at 6:09 AM To: "lisp@ietf.org list" Cc: "lisp-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf Folks, As Alberto mentioned in a previous

Re: [lisp] The LISP WG has placed draft-iannone-6834bis in state "In WG Last Call"

Support. Regards, Reshad. On 2018-05-21, 11:39 AM, "lisp on behalf of IETF Secretariat" wrote: The LISP WG has placed draft-iannone-6834bis in state In WG Last Call (entered by Joel Halpern) The

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-12

I have reviewed this document and I believe it's ready for the AD. Regards, Reshad. From: lisp on behalf of Luigi Iannone Date: Thursday, April 5, 2018 at 10:18 AM To: "lisp@ietf.org list" Subject: [lisp] WG Last Call for

Re: [lisp] The LISP WG has placed draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-pubsub in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

I support the draft to be adopted by the WG. Regards, Reshad. On 2018-04-03, 9:27 PM, "lisp on behalf of Joel M. Halpern" wrote: This was discussed in London, and the authors have requested working group adoption.

Re: [lisp] New name for upcoming LISP -OAM- document

Ack. On 2018-03-21, 8:37 AM, "Luigi Iannone" wrote: > > The cost and time we have spent on this topic has already exceeded the benefit. > This is also consuming my patience. During f2f meeting decision has been made. The last question was the

Re: [lisp] New name for upcoming LISP -OAM- document

I don't have a name suggestion either, but I do find it odd having a document with these 3 seemingly unrelated items (mobility seems to be the odd one out). So I would be in favour of proposal from Albert below. Regards, Reshad. On 2018-03-19, 4:53 PM, "lisp on behalf of Dino Farinacci"

Re: [lisp] 6830bis Review

I also believe SMRs should be in the CP doc. I would support Dino’s proposal below. Regards, Reshad. On 2018-01-15, 2:10 PM, "lisp on behalf of Dino Farinacci" wrote: I’d be willing to make a deal. SMRs go to 6833bis and

Re: [lisp] Adoption call: draft-lewis-lisp-gpe-04.txt

In favour. On 2017-12-15, 12:15 PM, "lisp on behalf of Florin Coras" wrote: +1 Florin > On Dec 15, 2017, at 8:40 AM, Fabio Maino wrote: > > As an author I support the adoption of this

Re: [lisp] [ERRATA] Call for WG Adoption of Vendor Specific LCAF [draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf-00.txt]

I support WG adoption of draft-rodrigueznatal-lisp-vendor-lcaf. From: lisp > on behalf of Luigi Iannone > Date: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 at 7:16 AM To: LISP mailing list list

Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-yang-05.txt

LISP WG, we are looking for comments/feedback on the LISP YANG model. The slides which we were planning on presenting are @ https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/99/slides/slides-99-lisp-lisp-yang-model-0 0.pdf I am now in Prague so if anyone wants to discuss f2f please send me a note. Regards,

Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of document draft-farinacci-lisp-geo-03.txt

Support adoption. Regards, Reshad. From: lisp > on behalf of Luigi Iannone > Date: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 at 8:03 AM To: LISP mailing list list > Cc:

Re: [lisp] Call for WG Adoption of document draft-moreno-lisp-vpn-00.txt

I support adoption of draft-moreno-lisp-vpn as LISP WG document. Regards, Reshad. From: lisp > on behalf of Luigi Iannone > Date: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 5:29 AM To: LISP mailing list list

Re: [lisp] Call for adoption draft-farinacci-lisp-rfc6833bis

I support adoption. I am willing to contribute or review. Regards, Reshad. From: lisp > on behalf of Luigi Iannone > Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 at 9:58 PM To: LISP mailing list list