Re: [lisp] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-iannone-6834bis-00.txt

2018-05-30 Thread Lori Jakab
Hi, I support this draft going to the AD. Best regards, -Lori On 5/20/18 8:17 PM, Joel Halpern wrote: > This starts a 4 week implicit adoption call and explicit last call for > the LISP Map Versioning draft revision with the purpose of moving this > work onto the standards track. > > Please

Re: [lisp] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-iannone-6834bis-00.txt

2018-05-20 Thread Alberto Rodriguez-Natal
I went again through RFC6834 while I was reviewing RFC6830/33bis. I think it can be sent to the AD. Thanks, Alberto On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 11:18 AM Joel Halpern wrote: > This starts a 4 week implicit adoption call and explicit last call for > the LISP Map Versioning

Re: [lisp] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-iannone-6834bis-00.txt

2018-05-20 Thread Joel M. Halpern
Yeah, if we wanted to take longer we could put in a filename change. But it doesn't actually matter. (usually, we need the name right so folks can find the document. I don't think that is a problem in this case.) I will do what is needed to attach it to the LISP WG page. Yours, Joel On

Re: [lisp] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-iannone-6834bis-00.txt

2018-05-20 Thread Dino Farinacci
Note the name of the WG document should be draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6834bis-00 (note “rfc” added). Cheers, Dino > On May 20, 2018, at 11:17 AM, Joel Halpern wrote: > > This starts a 4 week implicit adoption call and explicit last call for the > LISP Map Versioning draft

[lisp] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-iannone-6834bis-00.txt

2018-05-20 Thread Joel Halpern
This starts a 4 week implicit adoption call and explicit last call for the LISP Map Versioning draft revision with the purpose of moving this work onto the standards track. Please read the draft. And then speak up as to whether you agree or disagree with us sending this document to our AD for