[lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6833bis-10.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol WG of the IETF. Title : Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) Control-Plane Authors : Vince Fuller

Re: [lisp] Review 6833bis-08 - General and NMR

I will post at noon GMT if there are no objections. Dino > On Mar 21, 2018, at 12:52 AM, Victor Moreno (vimoreno) > wrote: > > I think the new text is much better, unambiguous and addresses all concerns. > > Thanks Dino, > > -v > >> On Mar 21, 2018, at 12:29 AM, Dino

Re: [lisp] New name for upcoming LISP -OAM- document

Ack. On 2018-03-21, 8:37 AM, "Luigi Iannone" wrote: > > The cost and time we have spent on this topic has already exceeded the benefit. > This is also consuming my patience. During f2f meeting decision has been made. The last question was the

Re: [lisp] Review 6833bis-08 - General and NMR

I think the new text is much better, unambiguous and addresses all concerns. Thanks Dino, -v > On Mar 21, 2018, at 12:29 AM, Dino Farinacci wrote: > >> Could I not do the above even if the EID-prefix DID NOT EXIST? Or are we >> restricting any application of policy only

Re: [lisp] New name for upcoming LISP -OAM- document

> > The cost and time we have spent on this topic has already exceeded the > benefit. > This is also consuming my patience. During f2f meeting decision has been made. The last question was the name and we opened for suggestion from the mailing list. Let’s not start again in endless

Re: [lisp] New name for upcoming LISP -OAM- document

> On 20 Mar 2018, at 18:13, Dino Farinacci wrote: > > I think the problem is that RFC6830bis has too narrow a definition of > “data-plane”. I believe you think it as the sole purpose of forwarding data > packets. I view it as the “nodes that make up the data-plane”

Re: [lisp] New name for upcoming LISP -OAM- document

Agree, OAM has much bigger scope than traceroute, so naming it with 'traceroute considerations' makes more sense. Thanks, Prakash -Original Message- From: lisp On Behalf Of Fabio Maino (fmaino) Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 9:06 AM To: lisp@ietf.org Subject: Re:

Re: [lisp] New name for upcoming LISP -OAM- document

I suggest "Considerations on LISP Mobility, Deployment and Traceroute" that puts a little less emphasis on mobility. I second Luigi's call to get done with this document and move on. Thanks, Fabio On 3/19/18 4:25 PM, Luigi Iannone wrote: Hi All, during today f2f meeting concern has been