Any status on this?
Dino
> On Sep 5, 2016, at 10:07 AM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
>
> See responses inline. A new draft is attached (but not submitted since I had
> some open questions).
>
>>> Document: draft-ietf-lisp-crypto-06.txt
>>>
>>> Reviewer: Danny McPherson
>>>
>>> Review Date: August
Nothing more from me (although I don't think that's where you query was
directed), all the changes look good.
On the IANA question, was simply a matter of if you want to require
something more rigid v. the most lax codepoint allocation model, but I
don't have any strong opinion there.
-da
> Nothing more from me (although I don't think that's where you query was
> directed), all the changes look good.
The query was for you. I wanted you to agree to the changes before I posted the
new version.
> On the IANA question, was simply a matter of if you want to require something
> more
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol of the IETF.
Title : LISP Data-Plane Confidentiality
Authors : Dino Farinacci
Brian Weis
Hi
The changes look good.
Stig
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
>> On Sep 9, 2016, at 4:15 PM, Stig Venaas wrote:
>>
In section 3 we have this paragraph:
The Address Family AFI definitions from [AFI] only allocate code-
points for the AFI value itse
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol of the IETF.
Title : LISP Canonical Address Format (LCAF)
Authors : Dino Farinacci
Dave Meyer
-15 posted. Thanks a lot Stig!
Dino
> On Sep 19, 2016, at 4:07 PM, Stig Venaas wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> The changes look good.
>
> Stig
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
>>> On Sep 9, 2016, at 4:15 PM, Stig Venaas wrote:
>>>
> In section 3 we have this paragraph:
