[lisp] Gen-ART IETF Last Call review of draft-ietf-lisp-ddt-08

2016-10-14 Thread Dale R. Worley
ttp://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-lisp-ddt-08 Reviewer: Dale R. Worley Review Date: 2016-10-09 IETF LC End Date: 2016-10-17 IESG Telechat date: 2016-10-27 Summary: This draft is on the right track but has open issues, described in the review. I believe th

Re: [lisp] Gen-ART IETF Last Call review of draft-ietf-lisp-ddt-08

2017-01-17 Thread Dale R. Worley
I reviewed draft-ietf-lisp-ddt-08, and my memory is that the only significant technical question was regarding the "D" bit in Map-Request messages. Thinking back on it, I believe that the difficulty I was having was with the explanation of the D bit, not its functionality. In particular, a DDT se

Re: [lisp] Gen-ART IETF Last Call review of draft-ietf-lisp-ddt-08

2017-01-17 Thread Dale R. Worley
Dino Farinacci writes: >> Both of these servers process Map-Request messages, albeit with >> different semantics. Hence the D bit in Map-Request messages is needed >> to differentiate which server is to process a given Map-Request message. > > The reason I explained the above was that the D-bit t