Jim and all,
Jim Dixon wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jan 1999, Darrell Greenwood wrote:
[Dixon, writing about a larger vs smaller ICANN membership:]
> >I don't know if ICANN would be wiser. It would certainly have
more
> >credibility. But the problem of verifying the identity of
members
> >becomes more com
On Sat, 23 Jan 1999, Darrell Greenwood wrote:
[Dixon, writing about a larger vs smaller ICANN membership:]
> >I don't know if ICANN would be wiser. It would certainly have more
> >credibility. But the problem of verifying the identity of members
> >becomes more complex with increasing membershi
On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, Darrell Greenwood wrote:
> At 1:13 AM -0800 1/22/99, Jim Dixon wrote:
>
> >Many things are simple. Failure is one of them.
>
> But it does not follow that keeping things simple will cause failure.
No. But if you leave off the wheels in order to simplify a car,
it won't g
William and all,
William X. Walsh wrote:
> Jeffrey is upset that he can't email me directly anymore with his little
> flames and false accusations :)
>
> Notice he can't just seem to get a clue about this issue, and has to bring it
> up everytime I point out the facts.
>
> So Jeff, since you o
Jeffrey is upset that he can't email me directly anymore with his little
flames and false accusations :)
Notice he can't just seem to get a clue about this issue, and has to bring it
up everytime I point out the facts.
So Jeff, since you only answer my questions with comments about myself, l
William and all,
Well william for one who is implicated by your EX-EMPLOYER
of financial fraud, I think your opinion is dubious at best.
Or do we
need yet another round of posted documentation regarding this
incident this week? Hu? Oh, an by the way what ever
happened to that IANA update
On 22-Jan-99 jeff Williams wrote:
> Estimating the total number of an potential ICANN membership at this
> juncture is surely premature in the extreme. It is interesting to see
> posters such as Jim Dixon make such invalid predictions however.
> I often see Jim Dixon making such predictions on
At 09:59 AM 1/22/99 +, you wrote:
>On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, Bill Lovell wrote:
>>
>> Uh, NSI, IP, IANA , and (with the above explanation) RIR I can handle. Since
>> I don't live in that domain (pun intended), what on earth "RFC editing has
>> been moved away from IANA. The IETF isn't terribly k
At 08:59 AM 1/22/99 -0500, you wrote:
>At 01:36 AM 1/22/99 -0800, you wrote:
>>At 09:13 AM 1/22/99 +, you wrote:
>>
>>>A small amount of thought might persuade you that this process is already
>>>well under way. The root servers remain with NSI. The root zone is
>>>frozen. The RIRs, the re
Jim and all,
Jim Dixon wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jan 1999, Darrell Greenwood wrote:
>
> > At 1:39 PM -0800 1/21/99, Jim Dixon wrote:
> >
> > >In the more real world, the DNS is (a) of transient significance
> > >(it's going to be replaced by directory search systems) and (b) of
> > >marginal financial
At 01:36 AM 1/22/99 -0800, you wrote:
>At 09:13 AM 1/22/99 +, you wrote:
>
>>A small amount of thought might persuade you that this process is already
>>well under way. The root servers remain with NSI. The root zone is
>>frozen. The RIRs, the regional IP address space registries, are thin
On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, Bill Lovell wrote:
> >A small amount of thought might persuade you that this process is already
['this process' = moving Internet core resources away from ICANN]
> >well under way. The root servers remain with NSI. The root zone is
> >frozen. The RIRs, the regional IP a
At 09:13 AM 1/22/99 +, you wrote:
>A small amount of thought might persuade you that this process is already
>well under way. The root servers remain with NSI. The root zone is
>frozen. The RIRs, the regional IP address space registries, are thinking
>things over. RFC editing has been m
On Thu, 21 Jan 1999, Darrell Greenwood wrote:
> At 1:39 PM -0800 1/21/99, Jim Dixon wrote:
>
> >In the more real world, the DNS is (a) of transient significance
> >(it's going to be replaced by directory search systems) and (b) of
> >marginal financial importance. Things are further confused by
14 matches
Mail list logo
