On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 07:18:28PM -0500, Jim Thompson wrote:
The topic has wandered away from pfSense.
It is rather interesting though, so please don't kill that
thread just yet.
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
Am Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:08:14 +0200
schrieb Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 07:18:28PM -0500, Jim Thompson wrote:
The topic has wandered away from pfSense.
It is rather interesting though, so please don't kill that
thread just yet.
Indeed.
I'd like to add that
I will use a 802.11n router with 3 antennas that is able to operate
simultaneously in the 2,4 GHz and 5 GHz band, so it advertises up to
900Mbps (i.e. 450 Mbps in the 2,4 + 450 Mbps in the 5 GHz band) - I do
not know if it is able to use 80 MHz channels, but I read at wikipedia
that this is
Hello Matthias,
Thank you for your time!
On 2013-10-25 12:45, Matthias May wrote:
I will use a 802.11n router with 3 antennas that is able to operate
simultaneously in the 2,4 GHz and 5 GHz band, so it advertises up to
900Mbps (i.e. 450 Mbps in the 2,4 + 450 Mbps in the 5 GHz band) - I do
Before I start digging an endless hole is this even possible.
Site has a Netgate m1n1wall 2D3/2D13.
Currently on the WAN and LAN ports are in use. 1:N NAT in general plus
several 1:1 for some servers that need to be accessed from outside. 3rd
Ethernet port is not in use.
What I'm asked to
On 25/10/13 13:56, Thinker Rix wrote:
You don't have multiple radios per card. You have multiple RF-chains
which each can carry their own spatial stream.
The number of antennas most often (but not necessarily) correlate
with the number of RF-chains you have internally.
Yes, as far as I
We just upgraded a box from 2.0.3 release to 2.1 release - and not sure
if it is related or coincidence but started having bizarre routing issue
post upgrade when using gateway groups.
Scenario
Dual WAN (em0 em1 drivers)
Quad LAN (igb0 and igb3 in use)
igb3 has multiple VLAN'd interfaces (5 -
