Re: [pfSense] IPv6 address data validation

2014-02-11 Thread Chris Buechler
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Brian Candler b.cand...@pobox.com wrote: [For some reason the 'New Issue' button on redmine is no longer visible to me, so I'll record this minor issue here] I misunderstood redmine's permissions and broke that temporarily, should work now. If not, please

[pfSense] Deploy openVPN client through AD gpo

2014-02-11 Thread rajan agarwal
Hi, I want to deploy the openVPN client exported through the client export utility using a gpo in MS AD. Wondering if someone has done this for the client exported by pfsense. I have tried this for the openVPN client from openvpn.net following the below link:

Re: [pfSense] Deploy openVPN client through AD gpo

2014-02-11 Thread Nishant Sharma
Hi Rajan, On Tuesday 11 February 2014 03:08 PM, rajan agarwal wrote: It works but i need the management UI from pfsense Client export as my users are not given any administrative privileges. Just export the config from pfSense GUI and see the parameters added for Management Interface. Add them

Re: [pfSense] Deploy openVPN client through AD gpo

2014-02-11 Thread rajan agarwal
Hi Nishant, On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Nishant Sharma codemarau...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Rajan, On Tuesday 11 February 2014 03:08 PM, rajan agarwal wrote: It works but i need the management UI from pfsense Client export as my users are not given any administrative privileges. Just

Re: [pfSense] Deploy openVPN client through AD gpo

2014-02-11 Thread Nishant Sharma
On Tuesday 11 February 2014 03:39 PM, rajan agarwal wrote: it, but the installation is not at all successfull. I am not a windows guy and work on linux and opensource, Can't figure out the way around here. Same here :-) May be something is amiss related to the permissions while installation is

Re: [pfSense] Deploy openVPN client through AD gpo

2014-02-11 Thread rajan agarwal
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Nishant Sharma codemarau...@gmail.comwrote: May be something is amiss related to the permissions while installation is going on. Since, it installs tun/tap driver, full permission is required and a reboot is necessary. GPO is applied on as a computer policy,

[pfSense] FreeBSD 10.0 on Ubiquiti EdgeRouter Lite

2014-02-11 Thread Eugen Leitl
http://rtfm.net/FreeBSD/ERL/ FreeBSD 10.0 on Ubiquiti EdgeRouter Lite The Ubiquiti EdgeRouter Lite is a neat little device that costs less than US$100, has three Ethernet ports, and can run FreeBSD/mips. It's based on the Cavium Octeon CN5020 platform and features a dual core 500mhz MIPS64

Re: [pfSense] FreeBSD 10.0 on Ubiquiti EdgeRouter Lite

2014-02-11 Thread Jim Thompson
Thanks for this. As before, we'll supply a solution for pfSense on the ERL after 2.2 (based on FreeBSD 10) after 2.2 drops. -- Jim On Feb 11, 2014, at 7:25, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote: http://rtfm.net/FreeBSD/ERL/ FreeBSD 10.0 on Ubiquiti EdgeRouter Lite The Ubiquiti

[pfSense] Ipredator VPN service and PFsense

2014-02-11 Thread J Carano
I can not get Ipredator VPN service to work with openvpn on PFsense. When I think it is set up as it should be I get an error in the log: openvpn[15718]: Options error: --local and --nobind don't make sense when used together and the connection attempt fails. This is the contents of

Re: [pfSense] Possible MTU/PMTU/MSS issue with HE IPv6 tunnel over PPPoE DSL connection

2014-02-11 Thread James Conner
Check again. I found that the new servers that google deployed were not working properly. They would receive the PMTU packetĀ² packet to bigĀ² and would not scale down. They had over 200 servers that had a problem. ___ List mailing list

[pfSense] ICMP host unreachable and RFC1918

2014-02-11 Thread David Burgess
pfsense 2.1 I have internal subnets in the 10.0.0.0/14 address space and also a public subnet x.x.x.240/28 that is routed statically to pfsense's WAN address. pfsense sits at the edge of the network and I have another router whose only internet access is through pfsense. The x.x.x.240/28 public

[pfSense] IPSEC VPN - NAT in Phase 2 - NAT Rules?

2014-02-11 Thread Mark Street
Hi, We are running pfSense 2.1 nano on a Soekris - experiencing an issue with an IPSEC tunnel to a remote Sonicwall. We have two Phase 2 entries defined for two remote hosts on the remote endpoint. We are exposing 1 host on our network which is NAT'd in the Phase 2 entry on our side, we used

Re: [pfSense] IPSEC VPN - NAT in Phase 2 - NAT Rules?

2014-02-11 Thread Mark Street
- Original Message - Hi, We are running pfSense 2.1 nano on a Soekris - experiencing an issue with an IPSEC tunnel to a remote Sonicwall. We have two Phase 2 entries defined for two remote hosts on the remote endpoint. We are exposing 1 host on our network which is NAT'd in the

Re: [pfSense] IPSEC VPN - NAT in Phase 2 - NAT Rules?

2014-02-11 Thread Mark Street
From the 2.1 book: If you need to perform NAT on your local IPs to make them appear as a different subnet, or one of your public IPs, you may do so using the NAT fields underneath Local Network . If you specify a single IP address in Local Network and a single IP address in the NAT field, then