Is there a difference between the 4 and the 1C4? Is Netgate just trying to
fleece people for an extra $200 by packaging the entire thing together built
and tested?
http://store.netgate.com/kit-APU1C4.aspx
http://store.netgate.com/APU4.aspx
PC Engines only has the APU1C/APU1C4 listed with the
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 02:40:44PM +, Ryan Coleman wrote:
Is there a difference between the 4 and the 1C4? Is Netgate just trying to
fleece people for an extra $200 by packaging the entire thing together built
and tested?
http://store.netgate.com/kit-APU1C4.aspx
I asked the differences in the two line items from netgate.
On Jul 22, 2014, at 9:56, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 02:40:44PM +, Ryan Coleman wrote:
Is there a difference between the 4 and the 1C4? Is Netgate just trying to
fleece people for an extra
On Jul 22, 2014, at 10:58, Ryan Coleman ryanjc...@me.com wrote:
I asked the differences in the two line items from netgate.
Perhaps you should ask sa...@netgate.com
Jim
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
The difference is not $200, but about $100 with 8GB Sandisk Extreme Secure
[sic!] SDHC card included.
1. What's *secure* about this card? I suppose it's a regular SDHC one.
2. I would like to pay less, but I'm worried about assembling it right with
regards to cooling. Can anyone clarify how is
Just like the others: dissipation through the aluminum case. Mine get toasty
but they haven't cooked yet. You could cut a fan in the case if you needed to.
On Jul 22, 2014, at 14:29, Nickolai Leschov nlesc...@gmail.com wrote:
The difference is not $200, but about $100 with 8GB Sandisk
Just like the others: dissipation through the aluminum case
How does the CPU connect to the aluminum case? Is there some thermal
interface involved? Maybe an interface between CPU heatsink and aluminum
case?
Mine get toasty but they haven't cooked yet. You could cut a fan in the
case if you
On Jul 22, 2014, at 17:19, Nickolai Leschov nlesc...@gmail.com wrote:
I wonder why they wouldn't just build the board with some appropriate Atom
CPU?
:-)
And maybe even more performant, to boot? E3815, probably?
Bay Trail? Why? That's for tablets.
C2xx8 more likely.
On Jul 22, 2014, at 17:19, Nickolai Leschov nlesc...@gmail.com wrote:
Just like the others: dissipation through the aluminum case
How does the CPU connect to the aluminum case? Is there some thermal
interface involved? Maybe an interface between CPU heatsink and aluminum case?
Yes, there
Do you happen to have an image of this?
On Jul 22, 2014, at 16:28, Jim Thompson j...@smallworks.com wrote:
On Jul 22, 2014, at 17:19, Nickolai Leschov nlesc...@gmail.com wrote:
Just like the others: dissipation through the aluminum case
How does the CPU connect to the aluminum case?
Bay Trail? Why? That's for tablets.
What's the difference, in practical terms?
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Hi Team,
Trying to figure out an issue i'm facing with pfsense 2.1.4. I'm routing
192.168.0.0/24 via pfsense. this block resides on a linux machine. within the
internal LAB if i ping to 192.168.0.5 , all the machines on the LAN can ping
successfully. However, if i ping from the linux machine ,
http://pcengines.ch/apucool.htm
Holger
Am 22.07.2014 23:31 schrieb Nickolai Leschov nlesc...@gmail.com:
Yes, there is a transfer pad.
What is this pad made of: some metal or is this a thermal shim, which is a
sort of paste?
___
List mailing list
It's most likely your specified Protocol in the allow rule you have
set. Open the rule that you believe should allow the traffic and
change the rule from TCP, UDP, TCP/UDP to say any.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Khurram Khan brokenf...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Team,
Trying to figure out an
Thanks, Holger!
I didn't notice this page. So it looks like it's some kind of thermal paste
allows for adequate thermal conductivity between the CPU/south bridge and
the aluminum heat spreader, but the heat spreader is in dry contact with
the case? I find it less than adequate, but let's hope
protocol in the rule is any. here's what the rule looks like:
Action:Pass
Interface: LAN
TCP/IP: IPv4
protocol: any
source: Type: network, address: 192.168.0.0/24
destination: any
On Jul 22, 2014, at 4:16 PM, Justin Edmands wrote:
It's most likely your specified Protocol in the allow rule
On 22/7/14 11:17 pm, Nickolai Leschov wrote:
I didn't notice this page. So it looks like it's some kind of thermal paste
allows for adequate thermal conductivity between the CPU/south bridge and
the aluminum heat spreader, but the heat spreader is in dry contact with
the case?
The one I've
Very little if this thread is related to pfSense.
Please stay on topic.
-- Jim
On Jul 22, 2014, at 17:32, Chris Bagnall pfse...@lists.minotaur.cc wrote:
On 22/7/14 11:17 pm, Nickolai Leschov wrote:
I didn't notice this page. So it looks like it's some kind of thermal paste
allows for
Look fuck nut: branded and shipped hardware is 100% on topic. Thank you.
On Jul 22, 2014, at 20:10, Jim Thompson j...@netgate.com wrote:
Very little if this thread is related to pfSense.
Please stay on topic.
-- Jim
On Jul 22, 2014, at 17:32, Chris Bagnall
Ryan,
Profanity and personal attacks have no place on this list.
-- Jim
On Jul 22, 2014, at 20:12, Ryan Coleman ryanjc...@me.com wrote:
Look fuck nut: branded and shipped hardware is 100% on topic. Thank you.
On Jul 22, 2014, at 20:10, Jim Thompson j...@netgate.com wrote:
Very
Who is the list mom and why is he/she not responding to this?
On Jul 22, 2014, at 6:12 PM, Ryan Coleman ryanjc...@me.com wrote:
Look fuck nut: branded and shipped hardware is 100% on topic. Thank you.
On Jul 22, 2014, at 20:10, Jim Thompson j...@netgate.com wrote:
Very little if this
On 23/7/14 2:10 am, Jim Thompson wrote:
Very little if this thread is related to pfSense.
Please stay on topic.
Respectfully, I disagree.
Given the APU is - as the de facto successor to the ALIX - likely to be
a piece of hardware used in a lot of new pfSense installs, discussion
about its
On Jul 22, 2014, at 16:30, Nickolai Leschov nlesc...@gmail.com wrote:
Bay Trail? Why? That's for tablets.
What's the difference, in practical terms?
First: Rangeley has an integrated i354 10/100/1000 quad Ethernet MAC. Bay
Trail requires one to add Ethernet
Second: Rangeley has a
I am. I have.
I'm trying to be patient and professional.
On Jul 22, 2014, at 20:47, Sean Colins s...@corequick.com wrote:
Who is the list mom and why is he/she not responding to this?
On Jul 22, 2014, at 6:12 PM, Ryan Coleman ryanjc...@me.com wrote:
Look fuck nut: branded and
Neither do accusations that a discussion that is VERY MUCH related to this list
has no place on this list.
Just because it does not relate to what YOU use pfsense for doesn’t mean it
does not belong. If that were the case most of the emails I get on a daily
basis have no place on this list.
::applause::
I may have fired off the message in a fit of frustration but you made it a
public statement - if you wanted to be the “mom” and handle it you should have
sent it privately instead of publicly.
—
Ryan
On Jul 22, 2014, at 21:15, Chris Bagnall pfse...@lists.minotaur.cc wrote:
On
On 23/7/14 4:11 am, Ryan Coleman wrote:
I may have fired off the message in a fit of frustration but you made it a
public statement - if you wanted to be the “mom” and handle it you should have
sent it privately instead of publicly.
I can't work out if the above is directed at me or Jim.
(I
It is my believe that we all are on this list, in this discussion,
because we have a requirement, desire and/or need of a solid network
security solution. I applaud the community as a whole for making pfSense
a product for that is available for the societal masses. #respect
Give me your low TTL,
Sorry, that was at our wonderful list mom. I should have noted it that way.
On Jul 22, 2014, at 22:18, Chris Bagnall pfse...@lists.minotaur.cc wrote:
On 23/7/14 4:11 am, Ryan Coleman wrote:
I may have fired off the message in a fit of frustration but you made it a
public statement - if you
Actually the margin is more like $250 - the board, case, SD all cost about $145
if you buy them from PCEngines.
My fleecing comment is based on the lack of a statement that says if you don’t
want the support you can look at this model, or give an option to opt out of
the support. Also calling
30 matches
Mail list logo
