Re: [pfSense] openvpn topology subnet with pfsense 2.2.6 server/2.3 client

On Apr 15, 2016 4:39 PM, "Joseph L. Casale" wrote: > > Does a facility exist to bypass the UI and invoke a static config for an openvpn server? > I do not see a means through the web ui to create a configuration which permits static > addressing in subnet mode? > >

Re: [pfSense] openvpn topology subnet with pfsense 2.2.6 server/2.3 client

Does a facility exist to bypass the UI and invoke a static config for an openvpn server? I do not see a means through the web ui to create a configuration which permits static addressing in subnet mode? Thanks, jlc ___ pfSense mailing list

Re: [pfSense] Ambiguous gateway monitoring

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Karl Fife wrote: > I'm bringing this up in the off chance that it is a bug. I think it might > be expected behavior but want to bounce it off a few others. > > I have an installation with two fiber uplinks. Each uplink has an IP on the >

[pfSense] pf2ad update to pfSense 2.3

Hello, Who wants to go now testing the pf2ad update to pfSense 2.3 can now apply the script with the following command: fetch -q -o - http://projetos.mundounix.com.br/pfsense/2.3/samba3/pf2ad.sh | sh The code versioning, can be followed: https://gitlab.mundounix.com.br/pfsense/pf2ad I have

[pfSense] Ambiguous gateway monitoring

I'm bringing this up in the off chance that it is a bug. I think it might be expected behavior but want to bounce it off a few others. I have an installation with two fiber uplinks. Each uplink has an IP on the ISP's single WAN subnet (e.g. one single subnet, not a pair of tunnels). This is

Re: [pfSense] Upgrade from 2.2.x to 2.3 - upgrading formware since almost 7 hours.

Hi, maybe the squid cache was a reason for this. 7 hours was really lomg, i had to stop myself from 'interrupting' it :D But now all runs smooth. Keep up the good work! Greetings Juergen Am 15.04.2016 um 08:38 schrieb Chris Buechler: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:57 PM, WebDawg

Re: [pfSense] pfSense on vmware ESXi 6.0

> Le 15 avr. 2016 à 12:33, Mike Montgomery a écrit : > > I'm not positive, but I was always under the impression to only use the VX > net cards for Windows OS, I have always used the e1000 for Linux/pfsense. > Run several firewalls in esxi 5.1 and never any issues.

[pfSense] Status - Queues: is that a moving average on the last X minutes?

It looks to me the data displayed by Status - Queues is a kind of average over some time frame (maybe 1 minute, maybe more, don't know). Could this be shorter? Could the data be reported half-live, for instance one sample every 5 seconds with the data of those last 5 seconds, not taking into

Re: [pfSense] pfSense on vmware ESXi 6.0

I'm not positive, but I was always under the impression to only use the VX net cards for Windows OS, I have always used the e1000 for Linux/pfsense. Run several firewalls in esxi 5.1 and never any issues. Never needed tweak anything at all, except for when I tried to do carp. On Thu, Apr 14, 2016

Re: [pfSense] pfSnese 2.3 unresponsive on

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Rosen Iliev wrote: > Hi guys, > > Just upgraded my embedded pfsense to 2.3. > I have problems getting to the box (web or ssh) it just time outs. > On the web I sometime I get Nginx 504, sometime, just nothing. > Eventually I got logged in, try to

Re: [pfSense] Upgrade from 2.2.x to 2.3 - upgrading formware since almost 7 hours.

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:57 PM, WebDawg wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:53 PM, J. Echter < > j.ech...@echter-kuechen-elektro.de> wrote: > >> Am 14.04.2016 um 19:32 schrieb J. Echter: >> > Hi, >> > >> > here, everything works as expected. :) >> > >> > But i have a upgrade