Re: [pfSense] Fwd: Re: small problem with squid

It seems to have been solved. -my setting now: kernel: vfs.read_max=128 kern.ipc.somaxconn=4096 kern.ipc.soacceptqueue=4096 kern.ipc.nmbclusters=100 squid: quick_abort_min 0 KB quick_abort_max 0 KB log_icp_queries off client_db off buffered_logs on half_closed_clients off memory_pools off

Re: [pfSense] Netgate Firmware

Thanks for the clarification. The issue I was referring to is AVR-54 in that same spec update. "System May Experience Inability to Boot or May Cease Operation” I didn’t see a way a BIOS update could resolve that issue! But I’m really glad to read that my box doesn’t use the LPC bus at all. That

Re: [pfSense] Netgate Firmware

One more time: there is only so much I can say about the issue. Richard Relph's message is inaccurate, but I can not describe why or how. Specific to the subject of this thread: The coreboot (it's not really a BIOS, and yes, I'm splitting hairs) update addresses a Intel-issued "specification cl

Re: [pfSense] Netgate Firmware

Google “cisco intel atom issue” for some of the coverage of the problem. The symptom appears to be that on a reboot (power on? cold reset? warm reset?) the Atom may not generate LPC clocks… kinda fatal. But it seemingly doesn’t happen in the course of normal operation. Richard > On Mar 21, 201

Re: [pfSense] SIP through IKEv2-tunnel

Time to do a pcap, and see what's actually happening. Look in the SIP session description (SDP) and see what IP addresses the client is telling the other side to communicate with. Divide and conquer. On 3/21/2017 5:42 AM, Martin Fuchs wrote: what really irritates me is the fact (tried it

Re: [pfSense] Netgate Firmware

Note despite the thread subject, the affected models are: SG-2220 SG-2440 SG-4860 SG-8860 SG-4860-1U SG-8860-1U However, what is the symptom? We have a handful of these in service at various clients but have not noticed any issues that we're aware of. -- Steve Yates ITS, Inc. -Or

Re: [pfSense] Netgate Firmware

Topic: SG-2440 bios upgrade:  https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=127418.msg703237#msg703237 On Mon, 2017-03-20 at 19:49 -0500, Richard A. Relph wrote: > OK, now you guys have me curious… > > I have a Netgate SG-2440 purchased directly from Netgate. I’ve > received no emails. I don’t fre

Re: [pfSense] SIP through IKEv2-tunnel

what really irritates me is the fact (tried it just now) that using it over OpenVPN instead of IKEv2 it works... any idea ? i'm gonna look over it again... Von: List im Auftrag von Martin Fuchs Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. März 2017 10:45:34 An: pfSense Support an

Re: [pfSense] SIP through IKEv2-tunnel

no change with sipproxd installed... very strange... Von: List im Auftrag von Martin Fuchs Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. März 2017 10:44:36 An: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List Betreff: Re: [pfSense] SIP through IKEv2-tunnel since it's only one client i did

Re: [pfSense] SIP through IKEv2-tunnel

I think so, too, that's what confuses me. Internet -> Router -> (NAT: IPSec, OpenVPN) pfSense so the SIP-Clients would tunnel trough the the router, terminate with the pfSense and the unencrypted packets are sent back to the router (which hosts the PBX). In my opitnion it should work, too..

Re: [pfSense] SIP through IKEv2-tunnel

since it's only one client i did not think about it but it's worth a try... Von: List im Auftrag von Eero Volotinen Gesendet: Montag, 20. März 2017 11:10:56 An: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List Betreff: Re: [pfSense] SIP through IKEv2-tunnel maybe yo

Re: [pfSense] SIP through IKEv2-tunnel

Hi ! No possibility to disable STUN on the SIP client. Von: List im Auftrag von Rosen Iliev Gesendet: Montag, 20. März 2017 19:51:26 An: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List Betreff: Re: [pfSense] SIP through IKEv2-tunnel Hi, Have you try to disable th