Hi there,
2013/11/7 Thinker Rix thinke...@rocketmail.com
Hi Michael,
On 2013-11-06 11:37, Michael Schuh wrote:
i have serval different Systems running,
including an old 3GHz Intel Pentium D-CPU with 2GBytes ECC Memory:
4 Nic, throughput max (so far): 115 MBytes/s at 20k irqs (no polling
i have serval different Systems running,
including an old 3GHz Intel Pentium D-CPU with 2GBytes ECC Memory:
4 Nic, throughput max (so far): 115 MBytes/s at 20k irqs (no polling
enabled, no special tweaking)
1 Nic is Broadcom, 1 Nic is Intel Pro1000 Desktop Adapter, the other two
Nic are an Intel
On 6/11/13 7:11 am, Thinker Rix wrote:
Unfortunately the motherboards I plan to buy supports only the
above-mentioned CPUs.
- Pentium
- 4th generation core i3
- Xeon E3-1200 v3
If your board supports a Core i3, it is *very* unlikely that it won't
also support the i5 of the same generation
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 09:11:08AM +0200, Thinker Rix wrote:
Unfortunately the motherboards I plan to buy supports only the
above-mentioned CPUs.
Anyone running pfSense on a HP Microserver G8?
http://b3n.org/installed-xeon-e3-1230v2-in-gen8-hp-microserver/
These are dual Broadcoms BCM5717
On 6/11/13 12:30 pm, Eugen Leitl wrote:
Anyone running pfSense on a HP Microserver G8?
I have - in the past - had it running on a G5 and a G6 if that's any help.
One of our clients is using it on a G7.
lspci on both mine show:
Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5723 Gigabit Ethernet PCIe (rev
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 04:12:09PM +, Chris Bagnall wrote:
On 6/11/13 12:30 pm, Eugen Leitl wrote:
Anyone running pfSense on a HP Microserver G8?
I have - in the past - had it running on a G5 and a G6 if that's any help.
One of our clients is using it on a G7.
lspci on both mine
On 2013-10-24 19:30, Thinker Rix wrote:
I am planning a new pfSense box and am wondering if the hardware that
I want to use will be sufficient.
Hardware:
2x Intel PRO/1000 PT Quad Port Gigabit NICs, each directly connected
via PCIe-8x to the North Bridge of the CPU
4x
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:20 AM, Thinker Rix thinke...@rocketmail.comwrote:
Hi all!
I will finally go for brand new hardware for this pfSense box. Given the
above-mentioned requirements, which of the following CPUs would you advise
me to buy:
Price Name Socket Cores Threads Cache Clock
Hi Moshe,
On 2013-11-06 08:35, Moshe Katz wrote:
Price Name Socket Cores Threads Cache Clock default Clock Turbo
33.69 EUR Celeron 1155 2 2 2 MB 2.7 GHz --
44.31 EUR Pentium 1155 2 2 3 MB 2.9 GHz --
93.77 EUR Core i3 1155 2 4 3 MB 3.4 GHz --
167.25 EUR Xeon 1155 4 4 8 MB
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 07:18:28PM -0500, Jim Thompson wrote:
The topic has wandered away from pfSense.
It is rather interesting though, so please don't kill that
thread just yet.
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
Am Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:08:14 +0200
schrieb Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 07:18:28PM -0500, Jim Thompson wrote:
The topic has wandered away from pfSense.
It is rather interesting though, so please don't kill that
thread just yet.
Indeed.
I'd like to add that
I will use a 802.11n router with 3 antennas that is able to operate
simultaneously in the 2,4 GHz and 5 GHz band, so it advertises up to
900Mbps (i.e. 450 Mbps in the 2,4 + 450 Mbps in the 5 GHz band) - I do
not know if it is able to use 80 MHz channels, but I read at wikipedia
that this is
Hello Matthias,
Thank you for your time!
On 2013-10-25 12:45, Matthias May wrote:
I will use a 802.11n router with 3 antennas that is able to operate
simultaneously in the 2,4 GHz and 5 GHz band, so it advertises up to
900Mbps (i.e. 450 Mbps in the 2,4 + 450 Mbps in the 5 GHz band) - I do
On 25/10/13 13:56, Thinker Rix wrote:
You don't have multiple radios per card. You have multiple RF-chains
which each can carry their own spatial stream.
The number of antennas most often (but not necessarily) correlate
with the number of RF-chains you have internally.
Yes, as far as I
On 24/10/13 5:30 pm, Thinker Rix wrote:
I want to have:
- full Gigabit wire speed between the DMZ and the LAN zone (i.e. 2x
Gigabit at max)
Would have thought you'd be fine here.
- full 450Mbps between the WLAN and pfsense
Even with 450Mbps *radios* I'd be amazed if you get more than
On Oct 24, 2013, at 12:02 PM, Chris Bagnall pfse...@lists.minotaur.cc wrote:
On 24/10/13 5:30 pm, Thinker Rix wrote:
I want to have:
- full Gigabit wire speed between the DMZ and the LAN zone (i.e. 2x
Gigabit at max)
Would have thought you'd be fine here.
- full 450Mbps between the
On 13-10-24 12:49 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
If those wireless links are for exterior paths, and not simply 802.11
LANs, then you’re in for a huge amount of trouble, as wireless isn’t
reliable. At all.
I have to disagree, at least partially. In the wireless world,
reliability costs!
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Chris Bagnall pfse...@lists.minotaur.ccwrote:
On 24/10/13 5:30 pm, Thinker Rix wrote:
1. Would the Core2Duo CPU be sufficient for my requirements or should I
chose the 2,4 GHz Quad-core, the 2,89 GHz-Quad-core or maybe an even a
more powerful CPU or totally
Hi Chris,
thank you for your time!
On 2013-10-24 20:02, Chris Bagnall wrote:
- full 450Mbps between the WLAN and pfsense
Even with 450Mbps *radios* I'd be amazed if you get more than ~80Mbps
out of your WLAN. Not a pfSense limitation, just a reality of WLAN
claimed radio speeds. I generally
On 25/10/13 12:02 am, Thinker Rix wrote:
Ok, I see. Does this change with a router that has a Gigabit-NIC to
connect with pfSense, or isn't that the bottle neck?
I've never encountered even a 100Mbps NIC being a wireless bottleneck at
2.4Ghz. The limitation is effective throughput through the
On 24/10/13 7:31 pm, Adam Thompson wrote:
If I upgraded to a better-quality unit, or switched to licensed
spectrum, I could probably eliminate the variability and increase speed
simultaneously.
Indeed, we have Ubiquiti kit running point to point links in the 5Ghz
unlicensed spectrum (band C)
The topic has wandered away from pfSense.
-- Jim
On Oct 24, 2013, at 18:48, Chris Bagnall pfse...@lists.minotaur.cc wrote:
On 24/10/13 7:31 pm, Adam Thompson wrote:
If I upgraded to a better-quality unit, or switched to licensed
spectrum, I could probably eliminate the variability and
What else is new with thinker as op.
25. okt. 2013 02:18 skrev Jim Thompson j...@netgate.com følgende:
The topic has wandered away from pfSense.
-- Jim
On Oct 24, 2013, at 18:48, Chris Bagnall pfse...@lists.minotaur.cc
wrote:
On 24/10/13 7:31 pm, Adam Thompson wrote:
If I upgraded to
23 matches
Mail list logo
