Re: [pfSense] IPSEC VPN - NAT in Phase 2 - NAT Rules?

2014-02-12 Thread Chris Buechler
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Mark Street wrote: > From the 2.1 book: > "If you need to perform NAT on your local IPs to make them appear as a > different subnet, or one of your public IPs, you may do so using the NAT > fields underneath Local Network. If you specify a single IP address in Loca

Re: [pfSense] IPSEC VPN - NAT in Phase 2 - NAT Rules?

2014-02-11 Thread Mark Street
>From the 2.1 book: "If you need to perform NAT on your local IPs to make them appear as a different subnet, or one of your public IPs, you may do so using the NAT fields underneath Local Network . If you specify a single IP address in Local Network and a single IP address in the NAT field, the

Re: [pfSense] IPSEC VPN - NAT in Phase 2 - NAT Rules?

2014-02-11 Thread Mark Street
- Original Message - > Hi, > We are running pfSense 2.1 nano on a Soekris - experiencing an issue > with an IPSEC tunnel to a remote Sonicwall. We have two Phase 2 > entries defined for two remote hosts on the remote endpoint. We are > exposing 1 host on our network which is NAT'd in the

[pfSense] IPSEC VPN - NAT in Phase 2 - NAT Rules?

2014-02-11 Thread Mark Street
Hi, We are running pfSense 2.1 nano on a Soekris - experiencing an issue with an IPSEC tunnel to a remote Sonicwall. We have two Phase 2 entries defined for two remote hosts on the remote endpoint. We are exposing 1 host on our network which is NAT'd in the Phase 2 entry on our side, we used t