On Thursday, February 13, 2014 09:43:36 PM Jostein Elvaker
Haande wrote:
The latter exposes not only the core of the product, but
also the workflow and priorities of those involved in
the making of pfSense. It's a level of transparency that
you see more and more of, and for me personally, is
On 13/02/2014 19:43, Jostein Elvaker Haande wrote:
The thing that brand names as Netgear now sells out of the box
products with re-imaged pfSense distributions is for me a no brainer.
Not only does it increase the user base of pfSense, meaning that bugs,
performance issues etc are more easily
On 14 February 2014 11:54, Brian Candler b.cand...@pobox.com wrote:
On 13/02/2014 19:43, Jostein Elvaker Haande wrote:
The thing that brand names as Netgear now sells out of the box
[..]
I welcome Netgear to the pfSense community as a most welcome addition,
and I hope to see similar
On Feb 14, 2014, at 5:15 AM, Jostein Elvaker Haande jehaa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 February 2014 11:54, Brian Candler b.cand...@pobox.com wrote:
On 13/02/2014 19:43, Jostein Elvaker Haande wrote:
The thing that brand names as Netgear now sells out of the box
[..]
I welcome Netgear to
Hi List,
Having purchased several pfSense devices assembled by Netgate (m1n1wall
and FW-7541), I've noticed that the pfSense pre-install image was
customized with Netgate branding and the firmware auto-update mechanism
was set to a Netgate URL.
Has this been discussed on the list before?
My
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Andrew Hull l...@coffeebreath.org wrote:
My knee jerk reaction is that this is A Bad Thing(tm), and I reloaded the
devices with images from ESF. Does anyone here have a strong opinion one way
or the other?
My first reaction is that the branding is a good
Am 13.02.2014 17:54, schrieb Andrew Hull:
[...] I've noticed that the pfSense pre-install image was
customized with Netgate branding and the firmware auto-update mechanism
was set to a Netgate URL.
Has this been discussed on the list before?
I don't think often for what I can remember.
On Thursday, February 13, 2014, Andrew Hull l...@coffeebreath.org wrote:
Hi List,
Having purchased several pfSense devices assembled by Netgate (m1n1wall
and FW-7541), I've noticed that the pfSense pre-install image was
customized with Netgate branding and the firmware auto-update mechanism
On Feb 13, 2014, at 12:10 PM, Chris Buechler c...@pfsense.org wrote:
On Thursday, February 13, 2014, Andrew Hull l...@coffeebreath.org wrote:
Hi List,
Having purchased several pfSense devices assembled by Netgate (m1n1wall and
FW-7541), I've noticed that the pfSense pre-install image was
On Feb 13, 2014, at 11:30 AM, Mathieu Simon (Lists) matsimon.li...@simweb.ch
wrote:
Am 13.02.2014 17:54, schrieb Andrew Hull:
[...] I've noticed that the pfSense pre-install image was
customized with Netgate branding and the firmware auto-update mechanism
was set to a Netgate URL.
My knee jerk reaction is that this is A Bad Thing(tm), and I reloaded the
devices with images from ESF. Does anyone here have a strong opinion one way
or the other?
In principle, perhaps, in practice probably not.
I've been using pfSense for awhile now, and buying hardware from Netgate for
On 13 February 2014 17:54, Andrew Hull l...@coffeebreath.org wrote:
My knee jerk reaction is that this is A Bad Thing(tm), and I reloaded the
I don't think this is a bad thing at all, I only consider it to be a
sign that pfSense is starting to really get a good foothold in the
market, and
On 14-02-13 01:44 PM, Jeremy Porter wrote:
I'm might disagree with that, because I'm the one that did that.
You might also that the Netgate auto-update URL, is https:
Most authorized pfSense re-brands, make customizations, include
changes or limits on the package repository.
Speaking with my
On 2014-02-13 09:27, David Burgess wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Andrew Hull l...@coffeebreath.org wrote:
My knee jerk reaction is that this is A Bad Thing(tm), and I reloaded the
devices with images from ESF. Does anyone here have a strong opinion one way
or the other?
My first
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Chris Buechler c...@pfsense.org wrote:
On Thursday, February 13, 2014, Andrew Hull l...@coffeebreath.org wrote:
Hi List,
Having purchased several pfSense devices assembled by Netgate (m1n1wall
and FW-7541), I've noticed that the pfSense pre-install image
In the mean time, everyone else has covered the reasoning in more
detail. You want to have a proper default config in place, so if you
reset to factory defaults, your interface assignments go back to where
they were originally, serial console setup appropriately where
relevant, etc. There also
On 2/13/2014 8:08 PM, Chris Buechler wrote:
No, no, no. Custom hardware-specific images are a good thing - when done by
us, as in the case of Netgate. More when I'm not on my phone.
In the mean time, everyone else has covered the reasoning in more
detail. You want to have a proper default
17 matches
Mail list logo
