> Not on the firewall. The other hosts do have the second NICs on the
> 10.0.0.0/24 network. As far as I know mixing different netmasks on
> NICs on the same switch shouldn't result in complete unreachability.
>
> I think I'll do some experimenting by isolating hosts on a
> different, unreachable
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 09:12:21AM -0500, Ugo Bellavance wrote:
>> Behavior is the same with /16, ping gets me "Destination Host Unreachable",
>> while the pfSense itself has no isssue reaching anything outside.
>>
>> As soon as I reset the LAN back to 10.0.0.1/24 everything
>> from the outside in
On 2011-11-27 10:14, Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 04:07:31PM +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
While trying to build VIPs and do 1:1 NAT I accidentally noticed
that setting LAN to 10.0.0.1/8 (instead of 10.0.0.1/24)
will make the system unresponsive (this is 2.1-DEVELOPMENT (i386)
built o
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 04:07:31PM +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
>
> While trying to build VIPs and do 1:1 NAT I accidentally noticed
> that setting LAN to 10.0.0.1/8 (instead of 10.0.0.1/24)
> will make the system unresponsive (this is 2.1-DEVELOPMENT (i386)
> built on Fri Oct 21 12:51:56 EDT 2011).
While trying to build VIPs and do 1:1 NAT I accidentally noticed
that setting LAN to 10.0.0.1/8 (instead of 10.0.0.1/24)
will make the system unresponsive (this is 2.1-DEVELOPMENT (i386)
built on Fri Oct 21 12:51:56 EDT 2011). I also have other hosts
on the 10.0.0.0/24 network -- not sure what mix