Hi tim,
I'm also having the same setup as you are, what i do is :
1. At the routing menu, i registered the squid ip as the gateways and use the
policy routing in the firewall to pass all the http traffic to the squid server
after all those http traffic to the remote VPN. At the squid, i'm
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 3:59 PM, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Agnello George
agnello.dso...@gmail.com wrote:
is there a special setting for
natting alias ips like ( eth0:1, eth0:2 ..etc )
You need manual outbound NAT, with an entry for each IP
Hi folks,
i have a pfsense 2.0-RELEASE (i386) setup with 2 carp interfaces.
vip1 192.168.10.100
vip20 178.15.116.170
Failover is working fine. After master returns, the backup claims to be
master for our wan interfaces - so we have two masters for wan :/
Lan is given back to master
Hi,
check your outbound nat, you have manual outbound nat configured (AON?).
If so, a source of any may introduce troubles with CARP, at least it did at my
location, I changed the outbound NAT rules from source any to our Internal LANS
(one LAN, one WLAN), just to be sure I added a third rule
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:50:07 +0200 (CEST), Raimund Sacherer
raimund.sache...@logitravel.com wrote:
Hi,
check your outbound nat, you have manual outbound nat configured (AON?).
If so, a source of any may introduce troubles with CARP, at least it did
at my location, I changed the outbound
I have a Linux machine as our company firewall/router at the moment.
Since reading the announcement of pfSense 2.0 (on LinuxToday!), I have
been considering replacing it with pfSense. There are some features
that I see as being big improvements over my existing system, such as
the web
On 21-9-2011 13:26, David Burgess wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:13 AM, David Brownda...@westcontrol.com wrote:
I have two WAN connections. One is a symmetric link (10/10), the other is
ADSL (8/1). I would like to set these up so that the symmetric link is the
main link, with the ADSL
I'm looking to add an ADSL2+ as second WAN to my home pfSense.
Unfortunately, the ISP (MNet) only offers FritzBox routers,
which have multiple issues (e.g. SSH session timeouts with
the official recommendation to use keepalive as a workaround,
which for me is an red flag indicating potential
On 21-9-2011 13:26, David Burgess wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:13 AM, David Brownda...@westcontrol.com wrote:
I have two WAN connections. One is a symmetric link (10/10), the other is
ADSL (8/1). I would like to set these up so that the symmetric link is the
main link, with the ADSL
Il 21/09/2011 14:05, Chris Buechler ha scritto:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati)
to...@interazioni.it wrote:
I think you should examine how CARP works on your routers and how it works
in pfsense.
In pre 2.0 version, PFsense CARP has a (fixed) different zone for each
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:13 AM, David Brown da...@westcontrol.com wrote:
First, on the Linux system I have two hard disks, each with two partitions.
The first partition on each is set as a software RAID1 and contains the OS,
configuration, data, etc. The second partition on each is
On 21/09/2011 13:41, Seth Mos wrote:
On 21-9-2011 13:26, David Burgess wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:13 AM, David Brownda...@westcontrol.com
wrote:
I have two WAN connections. One is a symmetric link (10/10), the
other is
ADSL (8/1). I would like to set these up so that the symmetric
Hmm, why switch to pfSense from Linux? I am considering the other way round,
from pfSense to Linux.
Mainly because the lack of wireless drivers with support for N and a buggy
Atheros FreeBSD driver.
Right know I'm thinking a base install of Debian, followed by only the
packages I need and do the
On 9/21/2011 10:34 AM, Bart Grefte wrote:
Mainly because the lack of wireless drivers with support for N and a buggy
Atheros FreeBSD driver.
FYI- pfSense 2.1 will be based on FreeBSD 9.x which has some N support.
Some of it isn't going to make it into 9.0-RELEASE but I imagine we'll
probably
Hi Bart,
On 21-9-2011 16:34, Bart Grefte wrote:
Hmm, why switch to pfSense from Linux? I am considering the other way round,
from pfSense to Linux.
Mainly because the lack of wireless drivers with support for N and a buggy
Atheros FreeBSD driver.
Although I do have some wireless card in my
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote:
Although for my network I use pfSense at the edge and an Asus RT-N16
running Tomato for my wireless N needs.
Ditto, except Netgear WNR3500L + Tomato. Also seriously considered
buying a couple Ubiquiti Unifi for the vlan
I've tried all 13 channels for g, no luck in increasing speed.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
Namens Tim Nelson
Verzonden: woensdag 21 september 2011 18:05
Aan: pfSense support and discussion
Onderwerp: Re: [pfSense]
Ugh, the last message was sent before I intended...
You should set your wireless equipment on a non-overlapping channel different
than those around you. From the screenshot you gave, channel 1 looks to be
about the best bet.
Also, I'm seeing a lot of 'Sitecom' stuff. Is that a local WISP? It
At that point, lining your entire apartment with copper mesh might be your only
option!
You could also
A) switch to a high-power AP, and drown out your neighbours,
B) switch to 802.11a,
C) use wires.
At that level of penetration, it would be good practice for the building to
become it's own
On 9/21/2011 1:11 PM, Bart Grefte wrote:
A: Not an option, if I go above 100mW my equipment will be taken away plus
there will be one hell of a fine. (Netherlands, max. allowed is 100mW.)
B: I don't think I've got devices supporting that standard. Only b/g.
C: I already use wires, mostly, but
Hi Everyone,
I was wondering if anyone has been able to get pfSense running on VMWare? And
if so, would you mind sharing how to do it. I was thinking of doing some
testing for a buddy and installing pfSense on a VM so I don't have to find or
setup another physical box for him.
Thanks
Joe
http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Installing_pfSense_in_VMware_under_Windows
;)
Van: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
Namens Joseph Hardeman
Verzonden: woensdag 21 september 2011 19:56
Aan: 'list@lists.pfsense.org'
Onderwerp: [pfSense] pfSense on VMWare
hi joseph
we have a pfsense 2 rc3 running on a vsphere 5 host with hardware version 8
the install is straight forward ;-)
create a vm, mount the iso and install it like any physical pfsense
greets ffo
On 21.09.2011, at 19:57, Joseph Hardeman
Cool, thanks. *S*
Joseph Hardeman
Data Center Manager - CIRRACORE
678-427-5890 DIRECT | 404-795-0631 FAX | http://www.cirracore.com
[Description: Description: cid:ED53C2CA-3294-4F96-A966-EF440E0603AE]
This email message is intended for the use of the person to whom it has been
sent, and may
Awesome,
I will give that a shot soon as I get a minute. I appreciate it. *S*
Joseph Hardeman
Data Center Manager - CIRRACORE
678-427-5890 DIRECT | 404-795-0631 FAX | http://www.cirracore.com
[Description: Description: cid:ED53C2CA-3294-4F96-A966-EF440E0603AE]
This email message is intended
On 21/09/11 16:38, Jim Pingle wrote:
On 9/21/2011 10:06 AM, David Brown wrote:
OK, I'll have a look at that. If I get a redundant setup with CARP
working then there is not the same need for raid - the whole router can
be switched out. But it is still nice to have, and makes recovery and
-Original Message-
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-
boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Jim Pingle
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 12:37
To: pfSense support and discussion
Subject: [pfSense] Wireless Signal Issues [was: Replacing a Linux
router with
Hmm, that's an idea, bookmarked :)
Thanks!
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
Namens Jim Pingle
Verzonden: woensdag 21 september 2011 19:37
Aan: pfSense support and discussion
Onderwerp: [pfSense] Wireless Signal Issues
Hi,
Op 21 sep 2011, om 19:11 heeft Bart Grefte het volgende geschreven:
B: I don't think I've got devices supporting that standard. Only b/g.
C: I already use wires, mostly, but I want to keep my laptop wireless. Just
not with 200kBps.
FYI, a Intel wifi 5100 agn mini pci-e card is 7 euro on
Hi,
Op 21 sep 2011, om 20:45 heeft Bart Grefte het volgende geschreven:
Already ran inSSIDer few months back: http://www.ravenslair.nl/GoT2/wifi.jpg
(Probably worse by now.)
A friend of mine also receives 25 something accesspoints in the living room,
and had packet loss to the gateway. I've
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 09:58, Bart Grefte b...@ravenslair.nl wrote:
To give an idea about the interference:
http://www.ravenslair.nl/GoT2/wifi.jpg , there are probably more networks by
now.
Nice! Looks like channels 1-3 are prime territory. Two tricks I've
also learned are to disable B
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 14:13, Bart Grefte b...@ravenslair.nl wrote:
It's called wisdom? Hmm...
Just checked the sources for regdb, not seeing a reference to 'wisdom'. :-D
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
On Sep 22, 2011 3:43 AM, Adam Thompson athom...@athompso.net wrote:
It would be much easier to accommodate that request if Amy of the email
clients I use permitted me to do so.
My Android phone does not permit doing so in any way whatsoever.
Eh? I'm using Samsung Galaxy Ace, and using the
33 matches
Mail list logo
