Re: [pfSense] Multiple port ranges in alias

2012-05-13 Thread Moshe Katz
We have aliases with multiple ports that work just fine: PortsAltHTTPS 444, 8443, 8444, 8445 Alternate HTTPS Ports for COMSERVER3 PortscPanelPorts 80, 443, 2083, 2087, 22, 2096, 2095 PortsJabber 5222, 9091, 7443, 5229 PortsNetmeeting 1720, 1503 Netmeeting Ports PortsRemoteManagement 443, 22 P

Re: [pfSense] NFS through pfSense

2012-05-13 Thread William D. Armstrong - BSSN
I use a nfsv3 and I forgotten a say in advanced tabs -> firewall/nat I check ' IP Do-Not-Fragment compatibility " and uncheck all reflection check box. - = - = - = - = - = - = - = - = - = - <.      Of course it runs         William David Armstrong <|==   Bio Syst

Re: [pfSense] NFS through pfSense

2012-05-13 Thread Michael Schuh
2012/5/13 Michael Schuh > > > 2012/5/13 Ian Levesque > >> >> On May 13, 2012, at 12:38 PM, William D. Armstrong - BSSN wrote: >> >> > I use this for access a nfs solaris 11 from another interface. >> > DMZ LAN >> > TCP/UDP 172.16.42.10*

Re: [pfSense] Error "powerd: lookup freq: No such file or directory"

2012-05-13 Thread Michael Schuh
2012/5/13 bsd > Le 12 mai 2012 à 21:20, Michael Schuh a écrit : > > > > > After more investigation, I would rather suggest using > /boot/loader.conf.local and add the following : > > > > cpufreq_load="YES" > > > > > > You also need to add : > > > > > > kern.timecounter.hardwarei8254 > > >

Re: [pfSense] Error "powerd: lookup freq: No such file or directory"

2012-05-13 Thread bsd
Le 12 mai 2012 à 21:20, Michael Schuh a écrit : > > After more investigation, I would rather suggest using > /boot/loader.conf.local and add the following : > > cpufreq_load="YES" > > > You also need to add : > > > kern.timecounter.hardwarei8254 > > in System: Advanced: System Tun

Re: [pfSense] NFS through pfSense

2012-05-13 Thread Michael Schuh
2012/5/13 Ian Levesque > > On May 13, 2012, at 12:38 PM, William D. Armstrong - BSSN wrote: > > > I use this for access a nfs solaris 11 from another interface. > > DMZ LAN > > TCP/UDP 172.16.42.10* 10.0.1.138 111 * > qACK/qOth

Re: [pfSense] NFS through pfSense

2012-05-13 Thread Ian Levesque
On May 13, 2012, at 12:38 PM, William D. Armstrong - BSSN wrote: > I use this for access a nfs solaris 11 from another interface. > DMZ LAN > TCP/UDP 172.16.42.10* 10.0.1.138 111 * > qACK/qOthersHighWWW >

Re: [pfSense] NFS through pfSense

2012-05-13 Thread William D. Armstrong - BSSN
I use this for access a nfs solaris 11 from another interface. DMZ LAN TCP/UDP 172.16.42.10* 10.0.1.138 111 * qACK/qOthersHighWWW -> SUN Remote Procedure Call TCP/UDP 172.16.42.10* 10.0

Re: [pfSense] NFS through pfSense

2012-05-13 Thread mayak-cq
and remember that NAT reflection won't work (if that is needed) -- from the thread in 2009: > NAT reflection for UDP has never really worked correctly. Search the > archives and forum and ticket system. I'm not sure anyone has > discovered > why, but the traffic hits the firewall and never com

Re: [pfSense] NFS through pfSense

2012-05-13 Thread Ugo Bellavance
On 2012-05-13 07:03, Nicolas Schlumberger wrote: 2012/5/12 Michael Schuh 2012/5/12 Ugo Bellavance On 2012-05-11 16:14, Michael Schuh wrote: 2012/5/11 Ian Levesquemailto:ian@crystal.harvard.**edu>> On May 11, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Ugo Bellavance wrote: > I'd need to have an NFS

Re: [pfSense] NFS through pfSense

2012-05-13 Thread Nicolas Schlumberger
> 2012/5/12 Michael Schuh > > > > > > > 2012/5/12 Ugo Bellavance > > > >> On 2012-05-11 16:14, Michael Schuh wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> 2012/5/11 Ian Levesque >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>On May 11, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Ugo Bellavance wrote: > >>> > >>>