[pfSense] Fwd: Not connect ipsec vpn remote with local network different to LAN

2012-12-18 Thread Maykel Franco Hernandez
Thanks thanks thanks Jim, it works

Very thanks. I love pfsense...is the best software firewall.

Bye.


2012/12/10 Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org

 On 12/10/2012 11:31 AM, may...@maykel.sytes.net wrote:
  ok, well, then only connect with cisco vpn update to pfsense 2.1?

 It has nothing to do with Cisco - it's the NAT+IPsec feature you need.

 On 2.0.x (and even 1.2.x) it connects fine to Cisco in setups that do
 not require NAT+IPsec.

 Since you require NAT+IPsec, you need 2.1.

 Jim

 ___
 List mailing list
 List@lists.pfsense.org
 http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list

___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list


Re: [pfSense] 1:1 NAT on pfSense 2.0.1

2012-12-18 Thread Rawlyk, Mark (Mark)
Make sure you set the WAN port to be able to proxy for the internal address.  I 
made this mistake several times.

From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On 
Behalf Of Marcio Merlone
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 11:07 AM
To: pfSense support and discussion
Subject: [pfSense] 1:1 NAT on pfSense 2.0.1

Greetings,

I am trying to make a dead simple 1:1 NAT from one wan address to an internal 
server. I was assigned the x.x.x.152/29 address for my WAN from my ISP, and 
designated the ip x.x.x.154 for pfsense while x.x.x.153 is its gateway. I can 
use pfsense as gateway for internet just fine. Now I want to open my web server 
to the world. I first created a virtual IP x.x.x.155/29 on the WAN interface as 
an IP alias, then a 1:1 NAT pointing x.x.x.155 to 10.0.0.215, which is my web 
server and finally created a respective firewall rule on the wan interface 
allowing traffic from wan to 10.0.0.215 on port 80. The same as on 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5lMRA1ntgz8

Is that all? Have I missed something? With this setup x.x.x.155 opens up 
pfsense login screen and not my web server. Can anybody help me track what's 
wrong?

Thanks and best regards.
--
Marcio Merlone
TI - Administrador de redes

A1 Tecnologia Industrial - Unidade Corporativa
Fone:

+55 41 3616-3797

Cel:

+55 41 9689-0036

http://www.a1.ind.br/http://www.a1.ind.br
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list


Re: [pfSense] 1:1 NAT on pfSense 2.0.1

2012-12-18 Thread Marcio Merlone

Em 18-12-2012 14:08, Rawlyk, Mark (Mark) escreveu:
Make sure you set the WAN port to be able to proxy for the internal 
address.  I made this mistake several times.

How is that? Sorry, I do not understand what you mean.

--
Marcio Merlone
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list


Re: [pfSense] 1:1 NAT on pfSense 2.0.1

2012-12-18 Thread Gerald Waugh

On 12/18/2012 10:06 AM, Marcio Merlone wrote:

Greetings,

I am trying to make a dead simple 1:1 NAT from one wan address to an 
internal server. I was assigned the x.x.x.152/29 address for my WAN 
from my ISP, and designated the ip x.x.x.154 for pfsense while 
x.x.x.153 is its gateway. I can use pfsense as gateway for internet 
just fine. Now I want to open my web server to the world. I first 
created a virtual IP x.x.x.155/29 on the WAN interface as an IP alias, 
then a 1:1 NAT pointing x.x.x.155 to 10.0.0.215, which is my web 
server and finally created a respective firewall rule on the wan 
interface allowing traffic from wan to 10.0.0.215 on port 80. The same 
as on http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5lMRA1ntgz8


Is that all? Have I missed something? With this setup x.x.x.155 opens 
up pfsense login screen and not my web server. Can anybody help me 
track what's wrong?




AFAIK there is no 1:1 NAT
We bridge WAN and OPT1 and the servers set on the OPT1 port
thus the servers have public IP addresses but are protected by the firewall
makes sort of a DMZ
with office PCs setting on the LAN PORT

--
Gerald
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list


Re: [pfSense] 1:1 NAT on pfSense 2.0.1

2012-12-18 Thread Marcio Merlone

Em 18-12-2012 15:39, Gerald Waugh escreveu:

AFAIK there is no 1:1 NAT

There is on 2.0.x.

My first description of the problem was the correct setup, I may have 
missed something and it got working later.


Thanks.

--
Marcio Merlone
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list


Re: [pfSense] 1:1 NAT on pfSense 2.0.1

2012-12-18 Thread Gerald Waugh

On 12/18/2012 11:56 AM, Marcio Merlone wrote:

Em 18-12-2012 15:39, Gerald Waugh escreveu:

AFAIK there is no 1:1 NAT

There is on 2.0.x.

My first description of the problem was the correct setup, I may have 
missed something and it got working later.



Oh, I was thinking 1.2.x
What was your problem? Or what did you do to get it working?


--
Gerald
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list


Re: [pfSense] 1:1 NAT on pfSense 2.0.1

2012-12-18 Thread Marcio Merlone

Em 18-12-2012 16:31, Gerald Waugh escreveu:

On 12/18/2012 11:56 AM, Marcio Merlone wrote:

Em 18-12-2012 15:39, Gerald Waugh escreveu:

AFAIK there is no 1:1 NAT
My first description of the problem was the correct setup, I may have 
missed something and it got working later.

What was your problem? Or what did you do to get it working?
Not sure, I guess pfsense was not default gateway for the internal 
server, or should have cleaned state tables.


--
Marcio Merlone
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list