Re: [pfSense] help
On 24/04/13 03:17, Vick Khera wrote: On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 5:46 AM, eyobe kebede e...@dbu.edu.et mailto:e...@dbu.edu.et wrote: but 10.134.192.154 is the WAN ip and 10.130.42.65 is default gate way Given that 10.134.192.154 is your WAN IP, and the netmask they gave you is 255.255.255.252, the *ONLY* other IP you can directly reach is 10.134.192.153. Your network address is the .152 address and your broadcast IP is the .155 address. Your default gateway must be within the network defined by the WAN IP + netmask, and the one they gave you is not within that network. To include 10.130.42.65 in your WAN network so that you can reach it directly, you will need a much, much wider netmask. Or some magic. Don't count on getting any magic any time soon. ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Didn't Jim already provide the solution to this problem 2 weeks ago? No point in pondering further on unusual setups :) ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Re: [pfSense] help
after along period of communication they give us new WAN ip 10.130.51.83 and and public ip of 197.156.75.54 how we can configure all the two ip addresses? On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Vick Khera vi...@khera.org wrote: On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 5:46 AM, eyobe kebede e...@dbu.edu.et wrote: but 10.134.192.154 is the WAN ip and 10.130.42.65 is default gate way Given that 10.134.192.154 is your WAN IP, and the netmask they gave you is 255.255.255.252, the *ONLY* other IP you can directly reach is 10.134.192.153. Your network address is the .152 address and your broadcast IP is the .155 address. Your default gateway must be within the network defined by the WAN IP + netmask, and the one they gave you is not within that network. To include 10.130.42.65 in your WAN network so that you can reach it directly, you will need a much, much wider netmask. Or some magic. Don't count on getting any magic any time soon. ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Re: [pfSense] help
after along period of communication they give us new WAN ip 10.130.51.83 and and public ip of 197.156.75.54 how can I include the two ip addresses? On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:17 AM, Vick Khera vi...@khera.org wrote: On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 5:46 AM, eyobe kebede e...@dbu.edu.et wrote: but 10.134.192.154 is the WAN ip and 10.130.42.65 is default gate way Given that 10.134.192.154 is your WAN IP, and the netmask they gave you is 255.255.255.252, the *ONLY* other IP you can directly reach is 10.134.192.153. Your network address is the .152 address and your broadcast IP is the .155 address. Your default gateway must be within the network defined by the WAN IP + netmask, and the one they gave you is not within that network. To include 10.130.42.65 in your WAN network so that you can reach it directly, you will need a much, much wider netmask. Or some magic. Don't count on getting any magic any time soon. ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Re: [pfSense] help
I am just a big dummy that is coming in late in the game. Is it possible that they are sending that IP to a router/modem and the router is doing nat. If so, is it possible to diable the routing functions and just use this as a bridge and not a router. I have seen this before with DSL and some cable modems. I have even seen cable modems that have an internal NAT IP, but also work with the public IP that is assigned to your account. Have you called your ISP and asked them how to use your static IP? Who is your service provider? Is this cable or DSL? Sorry if you have answered this before. I am coming in a little late. ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Re: [pfSense] help
we are using dSL and let me give you some information. we were using 10.130.48.72 IP address give by the ISP and for some reason we have purchased public ip 197.156.75.54. where technicians from the ISP do not give us how to use the IP addresses and it become difficult to configure it on pfsense. this are the solid facts wan ip 10.130.51.83 default gate way 10.130.65.42 public ip 197.156.75.54 our side and 197.156.75.53 ISP side the we need how to configure this in pfsense? On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Ryan Rodrigue radiote...@aaremail.comwrote: I am just a big dummy that is coming in late in the game. Is it possible that they are sending that IP to a router/modem and the router is doing nat. If so, is it possible to diable the routing functions and just use this as a bridge and not a router. I have seen this before with DSL and some cable modems. I have even seen cable modems that have an internal NAT IP, but also work with the public IP that is assigned to your account. Have you called your ISP and asked them how to use your static IP? Who is your service provider? Is this cable or DSL? Sorry if you have answered this before. I am coming in a little late. ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Re: [pfSense] help
Please don't top post. It makes helping difficult. From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of eyobe kebede Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 9:36 AM To: pfSense support and discussion Subject: Re: [pfSense] help we are using dSL and let me give you some information. we were using 10.130.48.72 IP address give by the ISP and for some reason we have purchased public ip 197.156.75.54. where technicians from the ISP do not give us how to use the IP addresses and it become difficult to configure it on pfsense. this are the solid facts wan ip 10.130.51.83 default gate way 10.130.65.42 public ip 197.156.75.54 our side and 197.156.75.53 ISP side the we need how to configure this in pfsense? I would try 2 things. 1st I would try to setup the public IP that was given to you (197.156.75.54) as a static IP in PF and setup the 197.156.75.53 as a default gateway. (Don't use DHCP) You will have to setup the DNS servers in the System General Setup tab. 2nd If that doesn't work, I would try to move the PPPOE login information to the PF box and put the DSL modem in bridge mode. ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Re: [pfSense] help
On 24/04/13 16:36, eyobe kebede wrote: we are using dSL and let me give you some information. we were using 10.130.48.72 IP address give by the ISP and for some reason we have purchased public ip 197.156.75.54. where technicians from the ISP do not give us how to use the IP addresses and it become difficult to configure it on pfsense. this are the solid facts wan ip 10.130.51.83 default gate way 10.130.65.42 public ip 197.156.75.54 our side and 197.156.75.53 ISP side the we need how to configure this in pfsense? See the second reply in this thread by jim: [quote] Some ISPs that are particularly stingy with IPs and bad at routing have been doing this. His ISP may have just forgotten to give him the proper gateway. But on the outside chance they really do expect him to use that 10.x address as the gateway, it may still be possible. http://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/972 Not supported in the GUI yet though. Jim [/quote] On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Ryan Rodrigue radiote...@aaremail.com mailto:radiote...@aaremail.com wrote: I am just a big dummy that is coming in late in the game. Is it possible that they are sending that IP to a router/modem and the router is doing nat. If so, is it possible to diable the routing functions and just use this as a bridge and not a router. I have seen this before with DSL and some cable modems. I have even seen cable modems that have an internal NAT IP, but also work with the public IP that is assigned to your account. Have you called your ISP and asked them how to use your static IP? Who is your service provider? Is this cable or DSL? Sorry if you have answered this before. I am coming in a little late. ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org mailto:List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Re: [pfSense] help
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Matthias May Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 11:02 AM To: list@lists.pfsense.org Subject: Re: [pfSense] help On 24/04/13 16:36, eyobe kebede wrote: we are using dSL and let me give you some information. we were using 10.130.48.72 IP address give by the ISP and for some reason we have purchased public ip 197.156.75.54. where technicians from the ISP do not give us how to use the IP addresses and it become difficult to configure it on pfsense. this are the solid facts wan ip 10.130.51.83 default gate way 10.130.65.42 public ip 197.156.75.54 our side and 197.156.75.53 ISP side the we need how to configure this in pfsense? See the second reply in this thread by jim: [quote] Some ISPs that are particularly stingy with IPs and bad at routing have been doing this. His ISP may have just forgotten to give him the proper gateway. But on the outside chance they really do expect him to use that 10.x address as the gateway, it may still be possible. http://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/972 Not supported in the GUI yet though. Jim [/quote] I don't understand your comment. He says that the public IP is 197.156.75.53 on the ISP side. This appears to be a proper gateway. On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Ryan Rodrigue radiote...@aaremail.com wrote: I am just a big dummy that is coming in late in the game. Is it possible that they are sending that IP to a router/modem and the router is doing nat. If so, is it possible to diable the routing functions and just use this as a bridge and not a router. I have seen this before with DSL and some cable modems. I have even seen cable modems that have an internal NAT IP, but also work with the public IP that is assigned to your account. Have you called your ISP and asked them how to use your static IP? Who is your service provider? Is this cable or DSL? Sorry if you have answered this before. I am coming in a little late. ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Re: [pfSense] help
Some ISPs that are particularly stingy with IPs and bad at routing have been doing this. I might be missing something, but it does seem like a pretty awful, and at best very temporary 'solution' to IPv4 shortage. I must admit if I were the OP, I'd probably be looking for a new DSL provider. Roll on widespread v6 adoption and NAT64 for access to the 'legacy internet' :-) Kind regards, Chris -- This email is made from 100% recycled electrons ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Re: [pfSense] help
On 24-4-2013 18:24, Chris Bagnall wrote: Some ISPs that are particularly stingy with IPs and bad at routing have been doing this. I might be missing something, but it does seem like a pretty awful, and at best very temporary 'solution' to IPv4 shortage. I must admit if I were the OP, I'd probably be looking for a new DSL provider. Roll on widespread v6 adoption and NAT64 for access to the 'legacy internet' :-) It looks like 464xlat is one of the better things that has come forth, however, it needs to be implemented on the client. Till that time, DNS64 and NAT64 will have to do. And it ain't pretty. Dual stack if you can folks! The water is fine! Cheers, Seth ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
[pfSense] Installing Perl Modules
I'd like to install some perl modules inside pfSense. How is this done? -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler. ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Re: [pfSense] Installing Perl Modules
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Odhiambo Washington odhia...@gmail.com wrote: I'd like to install some perl modules inside pfSense. How is this done? Check out http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Installing_FreeBSD_Packages -- .warren ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
[pfSense] Dandy pfSense appliance
I'd like to acquire a nicely designed device running pfSense. Is there a nicely designed device the size of a typical Netgear WiFi router device, with high specs? -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler. ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Re: [pfSense] Dandy pfSense appliance
Am 24.04.2013 19:40, schrieb Odhiambo Washington: I'd like to acquire a nicely designed device running pfSense. Is there a nicely designed device the size of a typical Netgear WiFi router device, with high specs? Depends what you think about high specs many 1 GE ports or even 10 GE, lots of cores etc? In case of sized like typical netgear wifi router device I guess you won't get much more than an atom in that form factor if it has to be fanless or otherwise very quiet and power-saving. Other than that prebuilt Core i/Xeon systems exist, but they are more likely to be 1 rack unit format (often not full depth) and less office-friendly I guess. Some hardware vendors are listed here: http://www.pfsense.org/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=44Itemid=50 -- Mathieu ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Re: [pfSense] Dandy pfSense appliance
On 24/4/13 7:05 pm, Mathieu Simon wrote: Depends what you think about high specs many 1 GE ports or even 10 GE, lots of cores etc? This. You also have to decide whether you actually need high specs in a router. There's little point in paying for multiple GigE or 10GE ports if your internet connection is in the sub-100Mbps range. FWIW, we've been using the ALIX boards for several years, and despite their apparently low spec, they'll happily route an FTTC 80Mbps/20Mbps connection without breaking too much of a sweat. Obviously if you're looking at datacentre applications you'll want something a bit beefier, but in that case, you probably aren't bothered about having a Netgear WiFi router size unit. Also worth mentioning that in my experience, WiFi is best done with a separate access point (or access points). It enables you to position it in the best location for signal dispersion, which might not be the same location as your internet connection's ingress. Kind regards, Chris -- This email is made from 100% recycled electrons ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
