Hi,
I noticed that non-quick floating rules on the LAN interface are
basically ignored if you have the "Default allow LAN to any rule"
enabled. The reason for this is that the default rule is marked as
quick (as are all rules in the LAN tab).
Wouldn't it be better to have that default rule at the
Does anyone know how to get this up and running?
For test purposes I have three machines on the same LAN that I would like to
bridge. ___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listi
> Keep your eye on this one, too:
>
> http://www.pcengines.ch/apu.htm
The ALIX doughter...
Great, already waiting for it, thanks Jim
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
On 09/20/13 10:48, Jim Thompson wrote:
>
>> On Sep 20, 2013, at 9:09 AM, Bill Arlofski wrote:
>>
>> To be clear, when I said non-ALIX, I meant to say "Netgate FW-7535H" with
>> 2GB (maybe 4GB, not sure right now) RAM.
>
> If you put 4GB in it, you're a magician.
:)
Yeah, I am pretty sure it
> On Sep 20, 2013, at 9:09 AM, Bill Arlofski wrote:
>
> To be clear, when I said non-ALIX, I meant to say "Netgate FW-7535H" with
> 2GB (maybe 4GB, not sure right now) RAM.
If you put 4GB in it, you're a magician.
___
List mailing list
List@lists.p
On 09/19/13 23:09, Bill Arlofski wrote:
> Ugo, seems this is a nanoBSD issue since I had the same issue on a non ALIX
> system with a 4G nano on a CF card.
To be clear, when I said non-ALIX, I meant to say "Netgate FW-7535H" with 2GB
(maybe 4GB, not sure right now) RAM.
:)
pfSense Dashboard sho
Supermicro has a ton of Atom boards (they just announced a new 8 core
model).
http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/
I'm using an old D510 based board, with an enclosure + picoPSU:
http://www.mini-box.com/M350-enclosure-with-picoPSU-80-and-60W-adapter
Regards,
-Jeppe
On Fri, Sep 2
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 07:41:11AM -0500, Jim Thompson wrote:
>
> > On Sep 20, 2013, at 6:45 AM, Odette Nsaka wrote:
> >
> > Does somebody know other reliable and cheap "embedded" platforms running
> > pfSense with no problem?
>
> http://store.netgate.com/Netgate-FW-525B-P1919C83.aspx
Some Su
> On Sep 20, 2013, at 6:45 AM, Odette Nsaka wrote:
>
> Does somebody know other reliable and cheap "embedded" platforms running
> pfSense with no problem?
http://store.netgate.com/Netgate-FW-525B-P1919C83.aspx
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 07:17:30AM -0400, Jim Pingle wrote:
> > The main limitation here is RAM, if your Alix has 256 MB it should be
> > fine really. The forwarding rate is limited to about 70 mbit, so if you
> > need more only the newer Soekris 6500 series would work.
>
> Keep your eye on this
*/In data venerdì 20 settembre 2013 09:54:17, Seth Mos ha scritto:/*
*/> On 20-9-2013 9:45, Odette Nsaka wrote:/*
*/> > First of all, thanks to the developers for the new fantastic 2.1
release./*
*/> > /*
*/> > /*
*/> > /*
*/> > I've been using Alix by PC Engines (WRAP's successor) succesfully for
On 9/20/2013 3:54 AM, Seth Mos wrote:
> On 20-9-2013 9:45, Odette Nsaka wrote:
>> First of all, thanks to the developers for the new fantastic 2.1 release.
>>
>>
>>
>> I've been using Alix by PC Engines (WRAP's successor) succesfully for a
>> lot of time. I was just wandering about PC Engines not
On 20-9-2013 9:45, Odette Nsaka wrote:
> First of all, thanks to the developers for the new fantastic 2.1 release.
>
>
>
> I've been using Alix by PC Engines (WRAP's successor) succesfully for a
> lot of time. I was just wandering about PC Engines not releasing new
> versions of Alix.
>
> And
First of all, thanks to the developers for the new fantastic 2.1 release.
I've been using Alix by PC Engines (WRAP's successor) succesfully for a lot
of time. I was just wandering about PC Engines not releasing new versions
of Alix.
And it seems to me they are going to be soon too old for next
14 matches
Mail list logo
