[pfSense] Interface stops working

2013-11-11 Thread Walter Parker
I have a pfSense 2.0.3 box with 5 interfaces, two of which are on motherboard ethernet controllers using the NVIDIA nForce4 CK804 MCP9 Networking Adapter chipset. These two connections connect to the upstream IP (WAN) and to the old IP space for the local network (LAN). I've been seeing the the c

Re: [pfSense] AES-NI support of the CPU: Does it make sense for VPN with pfSense?

2013-11-11 Thread Jim Thompson
I think the people with the relevant skill are willing to fix it, when they're show that what they did (cryptdev support) doesn't provide any benefit. read: it's being taken care of. On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Vick Khera wrote: > Did you get the sense people with the relevant skill were o

Re: [pfSense] AES-NI support of the CPU: Does it make sense for VPN with pfSense?

2013-11-11 Thread Vick Khera
Did you get the sense people with the relevant skill were open to a bounty for implementing the necessary fixes? On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Jim Thompson wrote: > I was at the FreeBSD Vendor Summit last week, and raised the AES-NI > issue as "important to be solved in the next six months".

Re: [pfSense] AES-NI support of the CPU: Does it make sense for VPN with pfSense?

2013-11-11 Thread Jim Thompson
I was at the FreeBSD Vendor Summit last week, and raised the AES-NI issue as "important to be solved in the next six months". The issue and fix are understood, it just needs someone to implement it (and then, presumably, backport it to 8.3, so we can release an update to 2.1 (2.1.1 or similar). J