We’re not doing a login page - it’s a simple thanks for coming, here are some
basic rules and see our specials. Think of it like a McDonald’s or chain coffee
shop page.
I can “bless” access through the CP - in fact I’m already doing that for the
CSS, images and javascript files.
On Feb 28, 201
I don’t think so. Your remote system will not have access to the things
pfSense needs to add the captive portal bypass entries to ipfw. Namely the MAC
address associated with the IP Address.
A RADIUS Server could be remote.
On Feb 27, 2014, at 8:17 AM, Ryan Coleman wrote:
> Can I have the i
I just checked google and the “best” solution from a few versions ago is to
reserve the MAC IP to something out of range.
I’d like to find a “simple” way to do that for my customer. Is there a better
way to block a MAC?
—
Ryan
___
List mailing list
L
Turned out to be bad/dieing hardware. Replaced the firewall with a new Dell
server and everything is back to normal.
Thanks,
James
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On
Behalf Of Chris Buechler
Sent: February-23-14 6:16 PM
To: pfSense support and discu
I believe so. I have two ports opened under Rules for my IPSEC configuration.
On Feb 28, 2014, at 3:27 PM, Brian Candler wrote:
> Is it necessary to add explicit rules to allow inbound ISAKMP (UDP 500) and
> ESP (IP protocol 50) on the WAN interface?
>
> I had a problem with pfsense 2.0.1 fai
Is it necessary to add explicit rules to allow inbound ISAKMP (UDP 500)
and ESP (IP protocol 50) on the WAN interface?
I had a problem with pfsense 2.0.1 failing to accept sessions initiated
by a Cisco ASA5505. tcpdump showed the ASA was sending ISAKMP phase 1
and pfsense was not replying. I a
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Oliver Hansen wrote:
> Hi Vick, I have used the Pantech UML290 on Verizon. It looks like VZW
> still sells the UML290 on their web site but I have not had experience yet
> with the UML295. I may get ahold of one sometime in the near future so if I
> do I'll let yo
hail,
I just got pfSense 2.1 running on an IBM machine using igb cards, and got all
crazy things from
them. I then found
https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,66908.msg367991.html#msg367991 and
https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/commit/f3a4601c85c4de78caa4f12fefd64067fd83dbe8,
and it looks
i am trying to block skype logging with the signature number 5999 and 6001
as describe in few howtos.
i added all p2p rules for skype. but the main signaure with sid 6001 is
missing. i can not see that signature in the list.
however i can see 5999 and few others related to skype which are not doin
unbelievable, but i've overseen the
following:
php: rc.initial.setlanip: The command '/sbin/ifconfig
'lagg0_vlan3' inet delete' returned exit code '1', the output was
'ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCDIFADDR): Can't assign requested address'
Am 28.
10 matches
Mail list logo