> On Jun 2, 2014, at 10:02 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote:
>
> It’s also a mistake to not report them to the maintainers. :)
That’s true, and the maintainers for Squid, Snort and Silicata are very good
about fixing said bugs.
Jim
___
List mailing list
List
It’s also a mistake to not report them to the maintainers. :)
On Jun 2, 2014, at 19:57, Jim Thompson wrote:
>
>> On Jun 2, 2014, at 13:18, Brian Caouette wrote:
>>
>> As much as I like pfSense it
>> and packages are really prone to glitches and over all bugs.
>
> PfSense has bugs, and packa
> On Jun 2, 2014, at 13:18, Brian Caouette wrote:
>
> As much as I like pfSense it
> and packages are really prone to glitches and over all bugs.
PfSense has bugs, and packages have bugs, but it is a mistake to conflate the
two.
___
List mailing lis
On 2014-06-02 11:18, Brian Caouette wrote:
This one shows a really low hit rate:
http://bbs.dlois.com:/lightsquid/index.cgi
I thought Squid was better than this. Suggestions?
I'm only seeing 4 users one day, 8 the other, and a fairly low amount of
data transferred, so a low hit rate is
I have a report page setup at: dlois.com/status.html
This page doesn't seem to update:
http://bbs.dlois.com:/bandwidthd/index.html
This one shows a really low hit rate:
http://bbs.dlois.com:/lightsquid/index.cgi
I thought Squid was better than this. Suggestions?
This page has errors:
Hi @list,
there is a blocked DSL-Dial-Up Network
89.233.72.0/21
which is covered also by a very big shot on the top spammers list.
89.233.64.0/18
if i remove this entry will it get reloaded after the filter reload or
is this for ever or up to the package update?
not sure how to deal with this
squidguard 1.4_4 pkg v.1.9.6 creates this config file:
The rule for Groups ACL for host1 is disabled.
/usr/pbi/squidguard-amd64/etc/squidGuard/squidGuard.conf
src host1 {
ip 10.1.1.1
log block.log
}
src host2 {
ip 10.1
Am 02.06.2014 10:33, schrieb Ulrik Lunddahl:
> Are you running pfSense as a VM?
>
> In that case you will not be able to, as HOST hardware instrumentations is
> not propagated to VM's.
Yup, the OP he won't be able to if this is the case, for physical
installation pfSense there is something we th
Are you running pfSense as a VM?
In that case you will not be able to, as HOST hardware instrumentations is not
propagated to VM's.
- Ulrik
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] På vegne af Brian Caouette
Sendt: 1. juni 2014 12:34
Til: pfSense Suppo
