I suspect you need to be looking not for anti-spoofing but for anti-bogon rules.
Can't remember what pfSense calls it offhand.
-Adam
On July 14, 2014 6:19:22 PM CDT, NetSys Pro wrote:
>Hello everyone,
>
>First of all, please note that I have already posted the question below
>
>on the pfSense fo
Hello everyone,
First of all, please note that I have already posted the question below
on the pfSense forum (see
https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=79081.0) since about 1 week
without any reply.
Given the urgency of the matter, I decided to post to the mailing list,
hoping for some he
*ISSUE SOLVED!*
I use the VLAN ID in the vSwitch and took off the TAG in the pfSense (just
adding a simple interface)
Thanks for the help guys!
2014-07-14 17:43 GMT-03:00 Jonatas Baldin :
> Using the same configuration, but excluding the ESXi host (using a
> physical pfSense) it worked smoothl
Using the same configuration, but excluding the ESXi host (using a physical
pfSense) it worked smoothly.
I tried to remove the VLAN ID Tag from the vSwitch, but didn't work too :/
2014-07-13 23:55 GMT-03:00 Justin Edmands :
> Here is some interesting info about esxi NICs when used with Cisco, o
On 7/14/2014 6:40 AM, Renato Botelho wrote:
> On Jul 13, 2014, at 21:43, Lyle Giese wrote:
>> I have a Soekris net4801, running 2.0.2-release(i386) NanoBSD Size 512mb.
>> It shows 2.1.2-release is available for auto-update.
>>
>> After downloading, I get an error message that the digital signatu
On Jul 13, 2014, at 21:43, Lyle Giese wrote:
>
> I have a Soekris net4801, running 2.0.2-release(i386) NanoBSD Size 512mb. It
> shows 2.1.2-release is available for auto-update.
>
> After downloading, I get an error message that the digital signature is
> invalid. I have to abort and the onl