>as close to wirespeed as possible, be happy with a C2758. ?
>
>Very
That C2758 has nice specs and should be able to keep up, however there seems to
be a throughput problem on at least one brand of board running the C2758. (I
think it’s more a problem with the nics than the cpu)
I
Jim
Thanks for the response. That is what I suspected, that the values were
populated at config time rather than connect time.
The main reason that I wanted to be able to use those values is because I
couldn't find a way to use an alias when defining a 'Client Specific Override'.
I wanted to
> Will A SMB without L3 capable switches, that needs routing between 3-4 local
> subnets (LAN, SERVERS, WIRELESS/GUEST, OTHER/DMZ) as close to wirespeed as
> possible, be happy with a C2758. ?
Very.
Is a dual socket Xeon a bit faster? Yes.
Does your application need that speed? Unlikely.
On 10/13/2014 10:46 AM, Paul Beriswill wrote:
> Now, when I create rules for the OpenVPN_Ops interface, using
> 'OPEN_VPN_OPS net' as 'Source' the rule never hits.
> It doesn't appear
> that the 'net' and 'address' aliases are being populated when the
> connection is established. Is this correct?
> In general HP servers work really well with FreeBSD.
> When you say "looking" are you in possession of one and need to make it work,
> or are you about to buy one? Is there some specific requirement about that
> hardware that makes you want to get it over anything else?
> I personally have f
On 13/10/2014 17:09, Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote:
To me, it looks like a disk issue:
mfi0: 35354 (465709273s/0x0002/info) - Patrol Read corrected medium error on PD
02(e0x20/s2) at 1692f3e4
mfi0: 35355 (465709275s/0x0002/info) - Unexpected sense: PD 02(e0x20/s2) Path
539358c92146, CDB: 2f 00 1
