Re: [pfSense] IPv6 Router Advertisement DNS

2015-06-05 Thread İhsan Doğan
Hi Chris, On Thursday, 04 Jun 2015 17:26 -0500, Chris Buechler wrote: I'm running IPv6 on my LAN interface and I'm experiencing some weird IPv6 Router advertisement issues. When I look at at Router Advertisement Daemon configuration, only the prefix and the DNS domain should be sent:

Re: [pfSense] Using on Fiber

2015-06-05 Thread Chris Bagnall
On 5/6/15 3:37 pm, Ryan Coleman wrote: And those of you with VMware experience… if I run the virtual firewall I would need to have at least a VMware Essentials license to come close to the throughput, right? Since the IOps are capped at something like 10MB/sec in the free version. I can't

[pfSense] Using on Fiber

2015-06-05 Thread Ryan Coleman
So our office is getting a big shot in the arm soon… We’re getting Gigabit service from US Internet here in Minneapolis. Has anyone had an experience using the physical or virtual Netgate routers with this type of connection? Are there things I need to look out for when setting it up and

Re: [pfSense] Using on Fiber

2015-06-05 Thread David Burgess
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Ryan Coleman ryan.cole...@cwis.biz wrote: Hmm. I wonder why my file transfers never exceed 10MB/sec then… I’ve been trying to migrate many TB of data via SCP That's likely the issue right there. ssh/scp/sftp won't go faster than that with the default settings.

Re: [pfSense] Using on Fiber

2015-06-05 Thread Espen Johansen
Any chance you have set something in the shaper that causes it? fre. 5. juni 2015, 17:43 skrev Ryan Coleman ryan.cole...@cwis.biz: On Jun 5, 2015, at 10:12 AM, Brennan H. McNenly bmcne...@singularisit.com wrote: And those of you with VMware experience… if I run the virtual firewall I

Re: [pfSense] Using on Fiber

2015-06-05 Thread Tiernan OToole
What guest you running? Could it be the virtual nic that's connected to the VM? --Tiernan On 5 June 2015 16:43:16 GMT+01:00, Ryan Coleman ryan.cole...@cwis.biz wrote: On Jun 5, 2015, at 10:12 AM, Brennan H. McNenly bmcne...@singularisit.com wrote: And those of you with VMware

Re: [pfSense] Using on Fiber

2015-06-05 Thread Ryan Coleman
Presently it’s Ubunutu 14.04.2 LTS Network interface is VMXNet3 on an Intel I350 GigE, Auto negotiated at 1000Mbps full duplex Switch is a Cisco SG300-50p Board is a SuperMIcro X9DR3 with 64GB RAM LSI 9270-8i controller with RES2SV240 expander (running 21 drives in R6) ESXi 5.5.0 For buildout

Re: [pfSense] Using on Fiber

2015-06-05 Thread Ryan Coleman
I’m not running this data through the firewalls - this is across the LAN right now. :-\ On Jun 5, 2015, at 10:46 AM, Espen Johansen pfse...@gmail.com wrote: Any chance you have set something in the shaper that causes it? fre. 5. juni 2015, 17:43 skrev Ryan Coleman ryan.cole...@cwis.biz:

Re: [pfSense] Using on Fiber

2015-06-05 Thread Walter Parker
There is a serverfault question about this: http://serverfault.com/questions/380778/vmware-seems-to-throttle-scp-copies-what-can-be-the-reason?rq=1 SCP does (did) have performance problems. They fall into two groups. First, over a WAN the internal buffer was a bit too small for high speed (100

Re: [pfSense] Using on Fiber

2015-06-05 Thread Ryan Coleman
On Jun 5, 2015, at 10:12 AM, Brennan H. McNenly bmcne...@singularisit.com wrote: And those of you with VMware experience… if I run the virtual firewall I would need to have at least a VMware Essentials license to come close to the throughput, right? Since the IOps are capped at

Re: [pfSense] Using on Fiber

2015-06-05 Thread Brennan H. McNenly
And those of you with VMware experience… if I run the virtual firewall I would need to have at least a VMware Essentials license to come close to the throughput, right? Since the IOps are capped at something like 10MB/sec in the free version. There are no IOP or throughput limits on the

[pfSense] CARP - Communication between Master and Slave over which NIC?

2015-06-05 Thread Hubschmid Lukas (s)
Hello everybody, Following scenario: - 2 pfSense nodes with two NICs each - both nodes are connected directly with a cable using one NIC (let's call this NIC SYNC) - both nodes are connected to the client network using the second NIC (let's call this NIC LAN) - 1 node is master (active), 1 node