I had the same issue but it was a problem in prio traffic shappers over a
vlan interface, which triggers a bug.
best thing to do is re-install and restore config.
no issues on a fresh install.




2017-07-13 12:39 GMT-03:00 WebDawg <webd...@gmail.com>:

> See, I do not think it is just me.
>
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Moshe Katz <mo...@ymkatz.net> wrote:
>
> > I saw a very similar crash when booting a fresh 2.3.4 install yesterday
> for
> > the first time.
> > I think it was before I had even configured it for the first time
> > (assigning interfaces and addresses, etc).
> > I rebooted the machine and then it came up fine and is still up with no
> > trouble.
> >
> >
> > Moshe
> >
> > --
> > Moshe Katz
> > -- mo...@ymkatz.net
> > -- +1(301)867-3732
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:43 PM, WebDawg <webd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I just upgraded 2.3.something to 2.3.4 and immediately upon reboot
> > > experienced kernel panics/crash dumps over and over.  The system would
> > > cycle over and over.
> > >
> > > I stopped the process thinking I had a bad raid but upon a fresh
> install
> > of
> > > 2.3.4 I experienced the same thing, except this time the system
> rebooted
> > 2
> > > times with the panics:
> > >
> > > <118>Synchronizing user settings...
> > >
> > >
> > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
> > > cpuid = 4; apic id = 04
> > > fault virtual address    = 0x0
> > > fault code        = supervisor read data, page not present
> > > instruction pointer    = 0x20:0xffffffff80d716ee
> > > stack pointer            = 0x28:0xfffffe0467c5ea00
> > > frame pointer            = 0x28:0xfffffe0467c5ea20
> > > code segment        = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b
> > >             = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1
> > > processor eflags    = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0
> > > current process        = 12 (swi1: pfsync)
> > >
> > > And then fixed itself.  I proceeded to reboot it a few times with no
> more
> > > panics.
> > >
> > > I submitted a crash dump to pfsense but has anyone seen this on x64
> intel
> > > hardware?
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > pfSense mailing list
> > > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> > > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pfSense mailing list
> > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
> >
> _______________________________________________
> pfSense mailing list
> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
>
_______________________________________________
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Reply via email to