Re: [pfSense] malformed packets

2017-10-31 Thread mad.scientist.at.large 
easilly done, non need to get nasty, just  because you can't admit a mistake.  
it's entirely acceptable on most list, if it isn't here a gentle nudge from an 
admin is more than sufficient, on the other hand, personal attacks are rarely 
tolerated and demonstrate a juvenile attitude.  i'm 54, born in chicago, my 
father was mayor in the suburbs, i know how politics works, and i know some 
have become rabid.  p.s. it's not a cycling file, it's a manually changed sig, 
but hey, go buy some tiki torches if it makes you feel better.

mad.scientist.at.large (a good madscientist)
--



31. Oct 2017 14:51 by ryan.cole...@cwis.biz:


> I concur but having checked out his previous posts… he has a cycling 
> signature file with quotes… 
>
> Aside from saying “adios” to this user there’s not a whole lot that could be 
> done about that specific idiocracy.
>
>>
>>
___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Re: [pfSense] malformed packets

2017-10-31 Thread Ryan Coleman 
I concur but having checked out his previous posts… he has a cycling signature 
file with quotes… 

Aside from saying “adios” to this user there’s not a whole lot that could be 
done about that specific idiocracy.

> On Oct 30, 2017, at 3:26 PM, Ryan Rodrigue  wrote:
> 
> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of
>> mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com
>> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2017 2:27 PM
>> To: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List
>> Subject: Re: [pfSense] malformed packets
>> 
>> thank you for your' reply, i'll try your suggestions.  complete newbe to
>> pfsense, but do know something about firewalls etc. and can basically
>> use wireshark and understand it.  fortunately the problem has become
>> much less severe.  Thank you.
>> 
>> mad.scientist.at.large (a good madscientist)
>> --
>> "The U.S. intelligence community concluded in a report made public in
>> January that the Kremlin sought to disrupt the 2016 election and sway
>> the race in Trump's favor."  From "thehill.com".  Only Trump and his
>> duplicitous supports try to say it was Clinton who conspired.  Frankly
>> Trump is likely guilty of treason, the sooner he's impeached and indited
>> the better, along with ALL of his supporters in goverment.
>> 
>> 
>> 30. Oct 2017 09:36 by st...@teamits.com:
>> 
>> 
>>> I saw your question but didn't see an answer...  Have you considered
>> Suricata or Snort to see if they can detect and block off the traffic?
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> Steve Yates
>>> ITS, Inc.
>>> 
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: List [> mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org> ] On Behalf Of >
>> mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com
>>> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 7:24 PM
>>> To: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List <>
>> list@lists.pfsense.org> >
>>> Subject: [pfSense] malformed packets
>>> 
>>> is there any way i can block malformed packets and drop them rather
>> than being used for a ddos attack?  this is related to LEGAL torrents,
>> i.e. copy left etc.  even running deluge there is a storm of malformed
>> packets with spoofed ip addrs, which then makes my machine send out
>> many, many malformed packets to people who didn't even send them.  Gee,
>> i thought doing a ddos on people was illegal, not that it matters in
>> most countries.
>>> ___
>>> pfSense mailing list
>>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>>> Support the project with Gold! > https://pfsense.org/gold
>> ___
>> pfSense mailing list
>> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
>> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
> 
> 
> Can we avoid posting political statements to this list?  You can have 
> whatever view you would like, but a router mailing list is hardly the place 
> to post them.  Thank you. 
> ___
> pfSense mailing list
> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Re: [pfSense] ASRock E3C236D2I+Pentium G4560 vs SM A1SRi-C2758F

2017-10-31 Thread ullbeking 
The ASRock C2750D4I is similar to the Supermicro C2758 as they both 
suffer from the same problem, i.e., the AVR54 C2000 bug.  I searched for 
"C2750D4I" in the forums and got a lot of hits describing the same problem.


In contrast, the ASRock E3C236D2I is completely thing, and sidesteps 
this issue altogether.  It's a Socket 1151 board, which means there's a 
clear upgrade path that doesn't even include the C2000.


I'll contact you privately about your spare pfSense system.


On 30/10/2017 14:35, Vick Khera wrote:

There are wide-spread reports of ASRock C2750D4I board failures in the
FreeNAS forums. I've suffered from it. Not sure if that applies to the
board you are considering.

There are also wide-spread reports of issues with the Supermicro board you
are considering. I have 4 of these in service for 3+ years with no issues.
I recently closed down one of my offices and have a spare pfSense branded
C2758 system if you're interested.

Personally, I'd go with the Supermicro solution. They easily handle Gigabit
WAN.
___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold


___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold