El mar, 22-05-2018 a las 20:54 -0400, John Johnstone escribió:
> On 5/18/2018 10:42 AM, Alberto José García Fumero wrote:
>
> > Im trying to block spam (for instance, from 185.234.217.232).
> > As far as I know, it's trying to pass as a message from my very
> > net:
&
El vie, 18-05-2018 a las 20:23 +0300, Eero Volotinen escribió:
> You should use postscreen/blacklist to block spam?
>
> Eero
>
Currently I'm using reject_rbl_client + sbnl.spamhaus.org,
cbl.abuseat.org and dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net.
I'll take a look at postscreen.
Thanks!
--
M.Sc. Alberto García
El vie, 18-05-2018 a las 16:24 +, Steve Yates escribió:
> I think your rule should work. Are you sure there is not
> another rule above that one in the list of rules, that allows the
> inbound connection? In other words the block rule has to be above
> the rule allowing traffic on port
Hi all.
I use PfSense 2.2.1. Of course I know it would very convenient to
upgrade, but right now it isn't possible.
Im trying to block spam (for instance, from 185.234.217.232).
As far as I know, it's trying to pass as a message from my very net:
Transcript of session follows.
De: Mail Deliv
