Ryan,
I know this is not your question but, my company setup Dynster.net for DDNS
needs. It's not built in to pfSense because we are trying to get info from devs
but, we do support a simple manual pfSense integration work around. It does
work.
Maybe it will help.
Andrew
On Monday, Septem
I'm curious... Do you have packet captures. I'd want to see your RTP media. I'm
wondering if that is causing your issue.
Andrew K. Mitchell, MSISPM
Managing Member & Senior Network Engineer
VoIPster Communications, LLC.
Toll-Free: (877) 378-1045 x2221
International: +1.502-694-3106 x2221
- O
protect
files/updates.pfsense.org. This should resolve your issue.
On 9/29/2014 6:37 AM, Andrew Mitchell wrote:
Thanks for the info.
I've been working working on this all night on and off.
My questions to you guys is, does files.pfsense.org and/or updates.pfsense.org
block bogon networks and
networks
Then I suspect that the issue is not in your network but a problem on the
software side.
On 9/29/2014 8:53 AM, Andrew Mitchell wrote:
Yeah. Connects to both files.pfsense.org and updates.pfsense.org servers fine.
Drew
- Original Message -
From: "Ryan Coleman&quo
rks
Have you tried pinging the IP from another machine not being routed through
your subnet?
On 9/29/2014 6:37 AM, Andrew Mitchell wrote:
Thanks for the info.
I've been working working on this all night on and off.
My questions to you guys is, does files.pfsense.org and/or updates
e to do
it from the console/SSH by running /etc/rc.update_bogons).
Moshe
Sent from mobile device; sorry for top-posting.
On Sep 28, 2014 10:26 AM, "Chris Bagnall" < pfse...@lists.minotaur.cc > wrote:
On 28 Sep 2014, at 12:19, Andrew Mitchell < andrew.k.mitch...@att.net > wr
ep 28, 2014, at 5:59 AM, Andrew Mitchell
> wrote:
>
> My company has just recently been assigned it's own block from ARIN. We have
> a handful of pfSense boxes we need to connect to from that block. I have
> noticed we can't when Block bogon networks is enabled on the WAN inte
My company has just recently been assigned it's own block from ARIN. We have a
handful of pfSense boxes we need to connect to from that block. I have noticed
we can't when Block bogon networks is enabled on the WAN interfaces.
Interestingly enough I also noticed that our block can't connect to
We have two independent facilities. One in Kansas City, MO and the other in
jacksonville, FL.
For the last two weeks or so, I have noticed something that seems odd.If I
traceroute from KC to updates.pfsense.org, here are my results:
1 dcna01.kc.voipster.org (192.40.140.1) 1.273 ms 0.468 ms
You can most certainly route VoIP traffic. I have an installation now 4500+
telephones between two locations. Open VPN works wonderful for this type of
traffic in my opinion because it's a connection overhead is extremely low even
with depression it's speeds are more than acceptable for what I n
Check the internal route between between Wayne want Hanaland one also confirm
there are no conflicting firewalls
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 18, 2012, at 6:55 AM, Pankaj Kumar wrote:
> WAN2 is working i have checked on system,on pfsense it is not working
> when i am connecting WAN1 LAN1 is wor
the firewall on the destination side of the tunnel.
I can't figure out where I have gone wrong. I would appreciate any advise.
Thanks,
Andrew
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 8:04 AM, John Busch wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 5:50 AM, Andrew Mitchell
> wrote:
> > I have 2 pfSense b
I have quite a few pfSense boxes deployed. I have only run into this twice.
Once was a DDR2 clockspeed mismatch. The second was a bad memory module.
So, in both cases it was memory/hardware related.
Hope that helps.
Andrew
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:16 AM, Hiren Joshi wrote:
> I'm still no clos
I have 2 pfSense boxes on a peer-to-peer shared-key OpenVPN tunnel. The LAN
on the server is 10.0.7.0/24. The LAN on the client is 192.168.1.0/24.
Server and client have bidirectional traffic just fine.
The client has multiple seperate peer-to-peer shared-key OpenVPN tunnels
tunnels to which it is
I know. Sorry I misspoke. Thanks for the help though.
Andrew.
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Vick Khera wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 4:34 AM, Andrew Mitchell
> wrote:
> > Doh! Found the issue... was closed but never opened for
> > whatever reason. Works now!
>
Perhaps I am misunderstanding but could you setup a separate tunnel? Peer
to peer shared key as an example?
Andrew
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 4:16 AM, Dave Warren wrote:
> Does anyone happen to know if pfSense (2.x)'s OpenVPN installation will be
> willing to use saved username/password credential
Doh! Found the issue... was closed but never opened for
whatever reason. Works now!
Thanks,
Andrew
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 3:31 AM, Andrew Mitchell <
andrew.mitch...@wdidata.net> wrote:
> In the GUI, I do see the blank entry listed under both the "Pools" and
> "Vir
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Jim Pingle wrote:
> On 12/26/2011 7:32 AM, Andrew Mitchell wrote:
> > redirect "" {
> > listen on port
> > forward to <> port
> > }
>
> You must have a blank entry under the Load Balancer config somewhere,
My fellow pfSensers,
Since I upgaded to 2.0.1, relayd fails to start reporting the following
error in System Logs:
The command '/usr/local/sbin/relayd -f /var/etc/relayd.conf' returned exit
code '1', the output was '/var/etc/relayd.conf:7: syntax error no
redirections, nothing to do unused proto
You can setup IDS/IPS rules (Snort Package).
Thats what we've done on100 or so client installs.
HTH,
Andrew
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Chuck Mariotti wrote:
> I have some clients that has been hit twice with the recent SQL
> injections that seem to be ramping up.
>
> See:
>
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
