I had my firewall rules ordered from top to bottom with the ACCEPTED
aliases at the top
Yesterday I noted that some accepted IP addresses were being blocked
Went to the admin GUI and noted in the Firewall Rules display that the
accepted aliases had moved to the bottom.
How would that happen?
TIA
://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
--
Gerald Waugh
Front Street Networks
(318) 734-4779
(318) 401-0428
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
/list
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
--
Gerald Waugh
Front Street Networks
(318) 734-4779
(318) 401-0428
___
List mailing list
List
On 09/12/2013 02:34 PM, Adam Piasecki wrote:
It sounds like my issue, i'll have to get the cable provider to change
the settings as they won't allow me access into the modem.
This is a Motorola SB6580G in bridge mode.
Best to get your own cable modem.
We had trouble with comcast modem setup,
On 07/21/2013 03:44 PM, Gerald Waugh wrote:
I see this error in the system log
*filterdns: host_dns: failed looking up blocked: hostname nor servname
provided, or not known
*
I have checked rules and aliases, but see nothing wrong.
Is there someplace else to look?
TIA
Bump;
Same Rules
I have searched the archives, and googled it, but have not found a solution
firewall is working great except MS Outlook is being blocked, all other
email clients work OK
filter.log does not give a clue. no blocking shown for the Outlook users IP
Sendmail/Dovecot Server maillog Disconnected:
On 03/17/2013 02:14 PM, Chris Bagnall wrote:
On 17/3/13 6:38 pm, Gerald Waugh wrote:
thanks for the response, I have ports set for '*' any
I moved this rule to the top of the rules list
TCP/UDP * * * * * none Internet to
servers
Out of curiosity, have you
On 03/17/2013 04:47 PM, Ermal Luçi wrote:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Gerald Waugh
gwa...@frontstreetnetworks.com
mailto:gwa...@frontstreetnetworks.com wrote:
On 03/17/2013 02:14 PM, Chris Bagnall wrote:
On 17/3/13 6:38 pm, Gerald Waugh wrote:
thanks
On 03/17/2013 05:36 PM, Chris Buechler wrote:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Ermal Luçi e...@pfsense.org wrote:
Try enabling on the rule to allow ip options.
It might be that the packets are being dropped due to having ip options in
them.
Outlook shouldn't be using IP options, we'd have had
On 02/21/2013 12:06 PM, David Burgess wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Gerald Waugh
gwa...@frontstreetnetworks.com wrote:
I must be missing something basic.
I have setup several pfSense systems, but my latest one in not blocking.
I have several firewall rules for the WAN port, and none
On 12/18/2012 10:06 AM, Marcio Merlone wrote:
Greetings,
I am trying to make a dead simple 1:1 NAT from one wan address to an
internal server. I was assigned the x.x.x.152/29 address for my WAN
from my ISP, and designated the ip x.x.x.154 for pfsense while
x.x.x.153 is its gateway. I can use
On 12/18/2012 11:56 AM, Marcio Merlone wrote:
Em 18-12-2012 15:39, Gerald Waugh escreveu:
AFAIK there is no 1:1 NAT
There is on 2.0.x.
My first description of the problem was the correct setup, I may have
missed something and it got working later.
Oh, I was thinking 1.2.x
What was your
12 matches
Mail list logo
