If this is browser-based access you are talking about, you might take a look at
the various browser extensions out there like Waste No Time. They allow you to
define certain times during which certain sites are accessible via the browser.
Obviously, this isn't network-level blocking, but perhaps
_IPsec_VPN
> for more info.
> -Adam
How does this situation affect dead peer detection, then?
Thanks,
Greg
> On 04/24/2015 09:37 AM, Gregory K Shenaut wrote:
>> I have two pfSense boxes connected via an IPSEC tunnel.
>>
>> I'm confused about whether a route g
_I_query_SNMP,_use_syslog,_NTP,_or_other_services_initiated_by_the_firewall_itself_over_IPsec_VPN
> for more info.
> -Adam
>
>
>
>
> On 04/24/2015 09:37 AM, Gregory K Shenaut wrote:
>> I have two pfSense boxes connected via an IPSEC tunnel.
>>
>> I'm confused about whether a route gets add
I have two pfSense boxes connected via an IPSEC tunnel.
I'm confused about whether a route gets added automatically to the remote
network end of an IPSEC tunnel when the tunnel comes up. I was under the
impression that there was no need to be concerned with routing between the two
subnets withi
> On Mar 23, 2015, at 17:31 , Chris Buechler wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Gregory K Shenaut
> wrote:
>> Hi, I have a system with two sites. One of the sites has two WAN
>> connections, the other one. I have an IPSEC tunnel passing all traffic
>&
Hi, I have a system with two sites. One of the sites has two WAN connections,
the other one. I have an IPSEC tunnel passing all traffic between the two
sites. I'm having some difficulty with site-to-site access. I can ping anything
in either site from either site, but can't do much of anything e
