Re: [pfSense] Finding the best network setup for pfsense.

2017-12-22 Thread Laz C. Peterson
Hello, A couple words from our experiences … We have quite a few firewalls and many services offered publicly depending on which site you’re talking about, and we’ve learned that it really doesn’t pay off to try and micro-mange the firewall. pfSense is done well, so by default, you can feel g

Re: [pfSense] IPSec tunnels on AT&T U-Verse

2017-05-15 Thread Laz C. Peterson
Matthew and Jim, We didn’t get a chance to test anything today. It turned out to be “one of those Mondays” … But there’s something really weird going on. I know nothing about the subject compared to Matthew — and he claims he knows nothing about it.. Ha ha … Is Openswan what is used for IPSe

Re: [pfSense] IPSec tunnels on AT&T U-Verse

2017-05-14 Thread Laz C. Peterson
unnel up, by using valid > IPs > on PFSense on other end of tunnel in the P2 auto-ping host entry. This will > keep the IPSec up all the time and keep it from getting foobarred, unless the > link itself has a gnarly outage, in which case you're down regardless. > > 11.

Re: [pfSense] IPSec tunnels on AT&T U-Verse

2017-05-13 Thread Laz C. Peterson
iki.strongswan.org/projects/strongswan/wiki/NatTraversal > >> On May 13, 2017, at 5:30 PM, Laz C. Peterson wrote: >> >> Hello everyone, >> >> We’re having a pretty interesting problem here … >> >> To give you the quick summary, we have AT&T U-Ver

[pfSense] IPSec tunnels on AT&T U-Verse

2017-05-13 Thread Laz C. Peterson
Hello everyone, We’re having a pretty interesting problem here … To give you the quick summary, we have AT&T U-Verse “Business Fiber” (which is a fancy way of saying it’s actual fiber, but the budget kind …) and have very serious issues establishing any TLS or SSL encrypted connections through