Re: [pfSense] Poweredge 2850

2014-05-22 Thread Peter Collins
On 22 May 2014 02:15, David QuayCendre david.quaycen...@gmail.com wrote: I have a 2850, with ESX you can't have VM in 64bits (CPU to old and VMWare don't work on this CPU family), but ESX is in 64bits Depending what guests you want to run, you could look at using Xen with a pv DomU.

Re: [pfSense] Poweredge 2850

2014-05-22 Thread Peter Collins
On 22 May 2014 11:43, David QuayCendre david.quaycen...@gmail.com wrote: Yes the CPU is 64bits, I think it work to in Proxmox. But VMWare don't want to work on this CPU to permit to use 64bits for VM. Yes if you want to limit yourself to using VMWare then you can't have 64bit guests unless

[pfSense] IPSec VPN connected by no traffic passing through

2014-05-19 Thread Peter Collins
Hi, I have a pfsense behind a Telekom Speedport W921v which connects a IPSec VPN to a Palo Alto device which has been working fine for months. However last night traffic stopped for no apparent reason. The pfsense WAN address is a 192.168.2.0/24 provided by DHCP om the Speedport and there is no

Re: [pfSense] IPSec VPN connected by no traffic passing through

2014-05-19 Thread Peter Collins
On 19 May 2014 18:10, Michael Schuh michael.sc...@gmail.com wrote: setup a mtr, target to palo alto (may be in udp mode is a good idea) and watch for routing issues and/or packet loss. sounds in first instance like a flaky connection or routing changes. try to disable any DOS

Re: [pfSense] Firebox-X20e

2014-01-06 Thread Peter Collins
Hi Doug On 3 January 2014 13:30, Doug Lytle supp...@drdos.info wrote: Has anybody used one of these for pfsense, or does anybody have suggestions of a small profile device that's under $100USD that would be a good fit? I can't give you any first hand information on the topic, but you might