Re: [pfSense] pfSense virtualisation
I second this strongly. Even then, we've had troubles bootstrapping in the past when someone (without thinking) had a component of the virtualsation server itself that relied on network access which was provided by a virtual machine... On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Adam Thompson <athom...@athompso.net> wrote: > The only thing I would caution against is having your only gateway to the > Internet running on a single host or cluster - this makes troubleshooting > VERY difficult when the host or cluster fails. Been there, done that. > So I have one H/W gateway running the internet pipe, then all the internal > firewalls are virtual. > -Adam > > > On October 10, 2017 2:57:29 PM CDT, Doug Lytle <supp...@drdos.info> wrote: > >>>> Or do you think I am absolutely crazy? Or maybe Just one Hardware > >and one virtual? > > > >Quite a few of my firewalls are virtualized using ESXI and have done so > >for a few years now. > > > >Doug > >___ > >pfSense mailing list > >https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > >Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold > > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > ___ > pfSense mailing list > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold > -- *Stephen Shkardoon* Security Consultant - ZX Security Limited Email: step...@zxsecurity.co.nz | Web: www.zxsecurity.co.nz ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
Re: [pfSense] Running newer then released?
Not the number, rather the message: "The system is on a later version than the official release.". Isn't this misleading? Isn't it on the *same* version as the official release? On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 3:10 AM, Vick Khera <vi...@khera.org> wrote: > What number exactly are you fretting about? > > As of Feb 16, FreeBSD 10.3-p16 was current, and pfsense 2.3.3 was and is > still current. > > > On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Stephen Shkardoon < > step...@zxsecurity.co.nz> > wrote: > > > The issue is that the message displayed is, exactly: > > ``` > > 2.3.3-RELEASE (amd64) > > built on Thu Feb 16 06:59:53 CST 2017 > > FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p16 > > > > The system is on a later version than > > the official release. > > ``` > > > > So I am guessing there's just a file to update somewhere or similar that > > was missing from the release process? > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 2:48 AM, Arno Gramatke <a...@gramatke.biz> wrote: > > > > > 2.3.3 is the current release, isn’t it? > > > > > > https://blog.pfsense.org/?p=2325 <https://blog.pfsense.org/?p=2325> > > > > > > > Am 03.03.2017 um 14:45 schrieb Yılmaz Bilgili < > li...@yilmazbilgili.com > > >: > > > > > > > > 03-03-2017 15:38 tarihinde Doug Lytle yazdı: > > > >> My home pfSense is reporting: > > > >> > > > >> 2.3.3-RELEASE (amd64) > > > >> built on Thu Feb 16 06:59:53 CST 2017 > > > >> FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p16 > > > >> > > > >> The system is on a later version than > > > >> the official release. > > > > > > > > Same with me. > > > > > > > > ___________ > > > > pfSense mailing list > > > > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > > > > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold > > > > > > ___ > > > pfSense mailing list > > > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > > > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > *Stephen Shkardoon* > > Security Consultant - ZX Security Limited > > > > Email: step...@zxsecurity.co.nz | Web: www.zxsecurity.co.nz > > ___ > > pfSense mailing list > > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold > > > ___ > pfSense mailing list > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold > -- *Stephen Shkardoon* Security Consultant - ZX Security Limited Email: step...@zxsecurity.co.nz | Web: www.zxsecurity.co.nz ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
Re: [pfSense] Running newer then released?
The issue is that the message displayed is, exactly: ``` 2.3.3-RELEASE (amd64) built on Thu Feb 16 06:59:53 CST 2017 FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p16 The system is on a later version than the official release. ``` So I am guessing there's just a file to update somewhere or similar that was missing from the release process? On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 2:48 AM, Arno Gramatke <a...@gramatke.biz> wrote: > 2.3.3 is the current release, isn’t it? > > https://blog.pfsense.org/?p=2325 <https://blog.pfsense.org/?p=2325> > > > Am 03.03.2017 um 14:45 schrieb Yılmaz Bilgili <li...@yilmazbilgili.com>: > > > > 03-03-2017 15:38 tarihinde Doug Lytle yazdı: > >> My home pfSense is reporting: > >> > >> 2.3.3-RELEASE (amd64) > >> built on Thu Feb 16 06:59:53 CST 2017 > >> FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p16 > >> > >> The system is on a later version than > >> the official release. > > > > Same with me. > > > > ___ > > pfSense mailing list > > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold > > _______ > pfSense mailing list > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold > -- *Stephen Shkardoon* Security Consultant - ZX Security Limited Email: step...@zxsecurity.co.nz | Web: www.zxsecurity.co.nz ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
