Re: [pfSense] NAT advice

2011-11-29 Thread Vaughn L. Reid III
On 11/29/2011 11:27 AM, Ugo Bellavance wrote: On 2011-11-29 10:59, David Burgess wrote: On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 6:36 AM, Ugo Bellavanceu...@lubik.ca wrote: Did I fail to provide enough info? I don't understand the question; you make some statements that don't appear logical to me, for

Re: [pfSense] NAT advice

2011-11-29 Thread Vaughn L. Reid III
On 11/29/2011 12:18 PM, David Burgess wrote: On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Ugo Bellavanceu...@lubik.ca wrote: I know, but we didn't want to do any routing because subnets may change and overlap in the future, since this is two distinct organizations. I don't see how NAT fixes that.

Re: [pfSense] X86 to X64 Question

2011-10-14 Thread Vaughn L. Reid III
On 10/14/2011 1:19 PM, Jim Pingle wrote: If you upgrade from x86 to x64. Can you do the upgrade remotely from 2.0 release x86 using the gui? Or, is it necessary to do the upgrade from the pfsense console command line interface? It can be done remotely, but ... Also, when Seth mentioned

Re: [pfSense] pfsense 2.0 and xenserver 5.6.0

2011-09-29 Thread Vaughn L. Reid III
On 9/29/2011 2:22 PM, Victor Hugo dos Santos wrote: Hi, I was trying to install the pfsense in a Xenserver 5.6.0 but I had this problem after boot. at i386 ISO image: = panic: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry, addr: c379a000 cpuid = 0 KDB: enter panic [thread pid 0 tid 0