Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote:
[Please don't threadjack. Start a fresh message rather than replying to
an existing message, or threading mailreaders will bury your message
under an unrelated topic]
On 6/27/2012 1:25 PM, Joe Landman wrote: Hi folks ... any guidance on
the 2.1 timeline? Is
Hi folks ... any guidance on the 2.1 timeline? Is it considered stable
for end user use yet? I'd prefer to deploy things actually marked as
stable (we have 2.0.1 in use at customer sites, and are playing with it
internally). I'd like to get 2.1 up for better driver support (and ease
of
[Please don't threadjack. Start a fresh message rather than replying to
an existing message, or threading mailreaders will bury your message
under an unrelated topic]
On 6/27/2012 1:25 PM, Joe Landman wrote: Hi folks ... any guidance on
the 2.1 timeline? Is it considered stable
for end user
