Re: [pfSense] 2.2.6 and IPv6 RA

2016-01-27 Thread Antonio Prado
On 1/22/16 11:02 AM, Seth Mos wrote: >> Is it a bug? > > No, that sounds about right, it advertises itself as the gateway. filed a bug: https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/5812 fixed in 2.3 -- antonio ___ pfSense mailing list

Re: [pfSense] 2.2.6 and IPv6 RA

2016-01-25 Thread Antonio Prado
On 1/22/16 11:02 AM, Seth Mos wrote: > Op 22-1-2016 om 8:53 schreef Antonio Prado: >> Hi, >> >> on a fresh installed box, IPv4 configured on 2 NICs (WAN and LAN), IPv6 >> not configured, pfSense starts advertising itself as IPv6 gateway on LAN >> using its link-local address (fe80::/64). >> >>

Re: [pfSense] 2.2.6 and IPv6 RA

2016-01-25 Thread Antonio Prado
On 1/25/16 10:15 AM, Antonio Prado wrote: >> No, that sounds about right, it advertises itself as the gateway. > > btw, it has been already reported: > > https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=101375.msg565424#msg565424 and here: https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=74774.0 thank you

Re: [pfSense] 2.2.6 and IPv6 RA

2016-01-23 Thread Antonio Prado
On 1/23/16 2:55 AM, Jon Gerdes wrote: > What is the fault you are actually trying to fix? before fixing, currently I'm trying to avoid breaking. consider a LAN segment where everything is working as supposed to: routing, v6 slaac etc. now, connect a new box in that scenario mounting a fresh

Re: [pfSense] 2.2.6 and IPv6 RA

2016-01-22 Thread Seth Mos
Op 22-1-2016 om 8:53 schreef Antonio Prado: > Hi, > > on a fresh installed box, IPv4 configured on 2 NICs (WAN and LAN), IPv6 > not configured, pfSense starts advertising itself as IPv6 gateway on LAN > using its link-local address (fe80::/64). > > That's not the correct behavior I guess. > >

Re: [pfSense] 2.2.6 and IPv6 RA

2016-01-22 Thread Antonio Prado
On 1/22/16 11:02 AM, Seth Mos wrote: >> on a fresh installed box, IPv4 configured on 2 NICs (WAN and LAN), IPv6 >> not configured, pfSense starts advertising itself as IPv6 gateway on LAN >> using its link-local address (fe80::/64). >> >> That's not the correct behavior I guess. >> >> Is it a bug?

Re: [pfSense] 2.2.6 and IPv6 RA

2016-01-22 Thread Antonio Prado
On 1/22/16 12:39 PM, Seth Mos wrote: >> in other words, nevertheless pfSense 2.2.6 has no IPv6 configured (i.e. >> no v6 address on interfaces, RA disabled), it advertises itself as IPv6 gw. > > Is your LAN interface not configured for IPv6 with address fe80::1:1? It > should be, it's in the

Re: [pfSense] 2.2.6 and IPv6 RA

2016-01-22 Thread Seth Mos
Op 22-1-2016 om 12:15 schreef Antonio Prado: > On 1/22/16 11:02 AM, Seth Mos wrote: >>> on a fresh installed box, IPv4 configured on 2 NICs (WAN and LAN), IPv6 >>> not configured, pfSense starts advertising itself as IPv6 gateway on LAN >>> using its link-local address (fe80::/64). >>> >>> That's

Re: [pfSense] 2.2.6 and IPv6 RA

2016-01-22 Thread Jon Gerdes
On Fri, 2016-01-22 at 12:15 +0100, Antonio Prado wrote: > On 1/22/16 11:02 AM, Seth Mos wrote: > > > on a fresh installed box, IPv4 configured on 2 NICs (WAN and > > > LAN), IPv6 > > > not configured, pfSense starts advertising itself as IPv6 gateway > > > on LAN > > > using its link-local address

[pfSense] 2.2.6 and IPv6 RA

2016-01-21 Thread Antonio Prado
Hi, on a fresh installed box, IPv4 configured on 2 NICs (WAN and LAN), IPv6 not configured, pfSense starts advertising itself as IPv6 gateway on LAN using its link-local address (fe80::/64). That's not the correct behavior I guess. Is it a bug? thank you -- antonio