Re: [pfSense] Alix Update 2.0.3 to 2.1 fails with 11 interfaces (/var full)

2013-10-12 Thread Jens Kuehnel
Am 12.10.13 00:35, schrieb Walter Parker: Hi, So, if I have an ALIX that I would like to upgrade, how much would I have to increase /tmp and /var by to have the upgrade run to completion without filling the partitions? How many Interfaces do you have. With 5 it is no problem with 11 it is.

Re: [pfSense] Alix Update 2.0.3 to 2.1 fails with 11 interfaces (/var full)

2013-10-12 Thread Jens Kühnel
Hi again, So, if I have an ALIX that I would like to upgrade, how much would I have to increase /tmp and /var by to have the upgrade run to completion without filling the partitions? How many Interfaces do you have. With 5 it is no problem with 11 it is. Can't tell you where the exact

Re: [pfSense] Alix Update 2.0.3 to 2.1 fails with 11 interfaces (/var full)

2013-10-11 Thread Jens Kühnel
Hi, I just tried it on an VMware based NanoBSD Version and it allways happens and it is not Memory based, because the VM has 1GB. I'm not a FreeBSD expert, but /dev/md's are MemDiscs right? Is there a reason why only 60MB (/var) and 40MB(/tmp/) are used? and are where are possibilities to change

Re: [pfSense] Alix Update 2.0.3 to 2.1 fails with 11 interfaces (/var full)

2013-10-11 Thread David Burgess
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Jens Kühnel pfse...@jens.kuehnel.orgwrote: and are where are possibilities to change that? It's not in the fstab! /etc/rc.embedded ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org

Re: [pfSense] Alix Update 2.0.3 to 2.1 fails with 11 interfaces (/var full)

2013-10-11 Thread Jim Pingle
On 10/11/2013 4:58 PM, Jens Kühnel wrote: I'm not a FreeBSD expert, but /dev/md's are MemDiscs right? Is there a reason why only 60MB (/var) and 40MB(/tmp/) are used? and are where are possibilities to change that? It's not in the fstab! They are that small because ALIX is the usual NanoBSD

Re: [pfSense] Alix Update 2.0.3 to 2.1 fails with 11 interfaces (/var full)

2013-10-11 Thread David Burgess
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote: On 2.1 you can adjust the /var and /tmp sizes under System Advanced on the Miscellaneous tab. Right! I had forgot about that. So following the original topic, could one more probably ensure a successful upgrade to 2.1 by

Re: [pfSense] Alix Update 2.0.3 to 2.1 fails with 11 interfaces (/var full)

2013-10-11 Thread Adam Thompson
On 13-10-11 04:25 PM, Jim Pingle wrote: They are that small because ALIX is the usual NanoBSD target and it only has 256MB of RAM so it's a safe low default. NanoBSD wasn't originally intended to run on device with gobs of RAM, but times are a-changin' and before long all of the viable new

Re: [pfSense] Alix Update 2.0.3 to 2.1 fails with 11 interfaces (/var full)

2013-10-11 Thread Walter Parker
So, if I have an ALIX that I would like to upgrade, how much would I have to increase /tmp and /var by to have the upgrade run to completion without filling the partitions? Walter On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Jim Pingle li...@pingle.org wrote: On 10/11/2013 4:58 PM, Jens Kühnel wrote:

Re: [pfSense] Alix Update 2.0.3 to 2.1 fails with 11 interfaces (/var full)

2013-10-11 Thread Jens Kuehnel
Hi, On 2.1 you can adjust the /var and /tmp sizes under System Advanced on the Miscellaneous tab. Right! I had forgot about that. and would not help because it is needed to be done before (or during) the upgrade. So following the original topic, could one more probably ensure a

[pfSense] Alix Update 2.0.3 to 2.1 fails with 11 interfaces (/var full)

2013-10-09 Thread Jens Kühnel
Hi, My questions: Has anyone successfully updated a PFSense on an Alix board with 10 or more interfaces (2 phy, 8 VLANs, 1 WAN). Or is running a PFSense 2.1 setup like this successfully? Reason: I just upgrade my home firewall from PFSense 2.0.3 to 2.1 (Nano 2G Serial) running on a Alix board.

Re: [pfSense] Alix Update 2.0.3 to 2.1 fails with 11 interfaces (/var full)

2013-10-09 Thread David Burgess
On Oct 9, 2013 7:05 PM, Jens Kühnel pfse...@jens.kuehnel.org wrote: NanoBSD, update 2.1 and embedded, but could not find anything. I also checked the forum, but I could only find file system full when I too came up dry when researching this issue. I ended up grabbing a spare system and