Re: [pfSense] Dual Port NIC ports

2015-02-21 Thread Chris Bagnall
On 21/2/15 11:33 pm, Tiernan OToole wrote: biggest disadvantage I can think is if you lose one card, you lose booth ports +1. If you have multiple physical cards at your disposal you might as well use ports on different cards - at least that way if something dies it'll be easy to diagnose

Re: [pfSense] Dual Port NIC ports

2015-02-21 Thread Tiernan OToole
, you lose booth ports... --Tiernan -Original Message- From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Joe Laffey Sent: Saturday 21 February 2015 23:26 To: pfSense Support and Discussion Mailing List Subject: [pfSense] Dual Port NIC ports Hi, Is there any advantage

Re: [pfSense] Dual Port NIC ports

2015-02-21 Thread compdoc
Is there any advantage or disadvantage to using the the two port on a dual port NIC vs. one port each on two different dual port NICs? Hopefully, the dual-port Intel Nics are pci-e, and so will be the fastest. The legacy Intel NIC could be PCI, and will be a bit faster than the Marvel nics. I

[pfSense] Dual Port NIC ports

2015-02-21 Thread Joe Laffey
Hi, Is there any advantage or disadvantage to using the the two port on a dual port NIC vs. one port each on two different dual port NICs? I am building a new box, and it has two dual port Intel NICs (as well as a legacy Intel NIC and a couple of Marvels on the mobo). Does it matter at all

Re: [pfSense] Dual Port NIC ports

2015-02-21 Thread Jim Thompson
On Feb 21, 2015, at 5:26 PM, Joe Laffey j...@laffey.tv wrote: Hi, Is there any advantage or disadvantage to using the the two port on a dual port NIC vs. one port each on two different dual port NICs? at 1Gbps or below? No, assuming they’re PCIe NICs and have a correct MSI-X