Re: [pfSense] Load Balancer: Virtual Servers vs DHCP assigned dynamic IP addresses

2011-11-23 Thread Dave Warren
On 11/22/2011 5:11 PM, Jim Pingle wrote: On 11/22/2011 7:45 PM, Dave Warren wrote: Is there any way to tell pfSense that these entries should represent interface IPs rather than hardcoding specific IPs? I don't recall if we reject the syntax in the GUI, but I believe relayd supports using a hos

Re: [pfSense] Load Balancer: Virtual Servers vs DHCP assigned dynamic IP addresses

2011-11-22 Thread Jim Pingle
On 11/22/2011 7:45 PM, Dave Warren wrote: > Is there any way to tell pfSense that these entries should represent > interface IPs rather than hardcoding specific IPs? I don't recall if we reject the syntax in the GUI, but I believe relayd supports using a hostname for such parameters. If you use a

[pfSense] Load Balancer: Virtual Servers vs DHCP assigned dynamic IP addresses

2011-11-22 Thread Dave Warren
Howdy, I'm running into an issue with 2.0-RELEASE and virtual servers on DHCP assigned WAN addresses. I'm currently running two WANs, both of which have their IPs assigned dynamically via DHCP. One changes infrequently (1-2 times/year), the other updates several times per month. Inside pfS