USB 2.0 can
only achieve 420Mbps.
http://www.amazon.com/TRENDnet-USB-100Mbps-Adapter-TU2-ET100/dp/B7IFED
My two cents.
Seko
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Lambert"
To: "pfSense support and discussion"
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 12:57:59 PM
S
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 09:25:32PM -0400, Chris Buechler wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
> >
> > It strikes me that if you only care about 10/100 Ethernet, you could also
> > use a USB - Ethernet adapter.
>
> Not sure there are any with reliable drivers, though I hav
On 26 jun. 2012, at 11:49, Chris Bagnall wrote:
> On 26/6/12 9:23 am, Pim van Stam wrote:
>> For higher demands than a Alix can deliver we use Jetway MB's with a
>> daughterboard option, like the NC9C-550-LF and AD3INLANG
>> Links:
>> http://www.jetway.com.tw/jw/ipcboard_view.asp?productid=781&p
On 26/6/12 9:23 am, Pim van Stam wrote:
For higher demands than a Alix can deliver we use Jetway MB's with a
daughterboard option, like the NC9C-550-LF and AD3INLANG
Links:
http://www.jetway.com.tw/jw/ipcboard_view.asp?productid=781&proname=NC9C-550-LF
http://www.jetway.com.tw/jw/ipcboard_view.a
ards with daugherboard possibility. The daughterboard can be
with realtek or intel chipset. Then you have a total of 4 Gbit interfaces
Depending on the case you could come under $300.
I'm interested in other options too.
With kind regards,
Pim van Stam
> Regards,
>
> Seko
>
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Chris Buechler wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
> >
> > It strikes me that if you only care about 10/100 Ethernet, you could also
> > use a USB - Ethernet adapter.
>
> Not sure there are any with reliable drivers, though I haven't
> e
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
>
> It strikes me that if you only care about 10/100 Ethernet, you could also
> use a USB - Ethernet adapter.
Not sure there are any with reliable drivers, though I haven't
experimented much at all with them, just going by user feedback. Those
quot;Jim Thompson"
> To: "pfSense support and discussion"
> Cc: "ignacio"
> Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 8:58:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [pfSense] Low(ish) cost pfSense platforms
>
>
> On Jun 25, 2012, at 6:45 PM, Diego Barrios wrote:
>
> Hi
-
From: "Jim Thompson"
To: "pfSense support and discussion"
Cc: "ignacio"
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 8:58:33 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense] Low(ish) cost pfSense platforms
On Jun 25, 2012, at 6:45 PM, Diego Barrios < s...@techsystem.com.br > wrot
On Jun 25, 2012, at 6:45 PM, Diego Barrios wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> I have the same problem here, need a "low-power low-cost" solution like the
> excelent Alix board, but with 4 or more 10/100 ports.
>
> After weeks of research I discovered that there is nothing like the Alix
> boards with mor
e the same point of view here... we just need an Alix 2D13 but
with 5 NICs =|
Regards,
Seko
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Bagnall"
To: "pfSense support and discussion"
Sent: Friday, June 8, 2012 1:49:45 PM
Subject: [pfSense] Low(ish) cost pfSense pla
On Jun 9, 2012 12:47 PM, "Larry Sampas" wrote:
>
> For my small-office installs the Supermicro Atoms are doing great, but I
have not yet had one at scale (thousands of concurrent states running at >
20Mbps).
I have that same board on a 30/3 connection that hits 30,000 states on a
daily basis. No
I've been using the Supermicro Atom Boards, specifically the D510 here:
http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ=H
My first Atom 330 was a disaster because of the RealTek NICs, but the
Supermicro above has two Intel NICs that have no issues running jumbo
frames.
For
On 9/6/12 2:14 am, Dave Warren wrote:
So they're not horrible choices (Mine is running on a P4 right now), but
they're not my first choice. Still, the upfront cost for these beasts is
cheap, going newer enough to cut power may not be worth it.
I guess that depends how much you're paying for pow
On 6/8/2012 12:03 PM, Moshe Katz wrote:
For small locations, I use refurbished Pentium 4 and Pentium D
machines with a bunch of PCI network cards (often Intel dual-port,
which can now be found cheap on eBay). It doesn't look (or sound) that
same as a little embedded system but it's pretty depen
:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On
Behalf Of Chris Bagnall
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2012 11:50 AM
To: pfSense support and discussion
Subject: [pfSense] Low(ish) cost pfSense platforms
Greetings list,
For many years I've been deploying pfSense on ALIX boards. They've proven to be
reliable and a
On Friday, June 8, 2012, Chris Bagnall wrote:
> On 8/6/12 6:12 pm, Tim Nelson wrote:
>
>> If you really don't need the throughput of an additional physical NIC, a
>> VLAN capable switch will give you as many 'ports' as you need. :)
>>
>
> That is in fact what I'm currently doing (with the HP 1700-
On 8/6/12 6:12 pm, Tim Nelson wrote:
If you really don't need the throughput of an additional physical NIC, a VLAN
capable switch will give you as many 'ports' as you need. :)
That is in fact what I'm currently doing (with the HP 1700-8 switches).
But it's a two-box solution which, in some en
- Original Message -
> Greetings list,
>
> For many years I've been deploying pfSense on ALIX boards. They've
> proven to be reliable and a good balance between cost and
> performance.
> Price in the UK is about 120 GBP (including PSU and chassis), which
> means that they're cost-comparabl
Greetings list,
For many years I've been deploying pfSense on ALIX boards. They've
proven to be reliable and a good balance between cost and performance.
Price in the UK is about 120 GBP (including PSU and chassis), which
means that they're cost-comparable with Draytek's higher end units
(whi
20 matches
Mail list logo
