Re: [pfSense] Unicast Flood

2016-08-17 Thread WebDawg
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Karl Fife wrote: > Answering my own question: > > Unicast flooding is fundamental. Unicast flooding in response to a null > switching table is the only way for a frame to reach the intended host, say, > if the switching table had an entry which expired before it

Re: [pfSense] Unicast Flood

2016-08-16 Thread Karl Fife
Answering my own question: Unicast flooding is fundamental. Unicast flooding in response to a null switching table is the only way for a frame to reach the intended host, say, if the switching table had an entry which expired before it could be re-populated with the host's arp reply. On 8/

[pfSense] Unicast Flood

2016-08-16 Thread Karl Fife
Hey all. I'm trying to get to the bottom of an Ethernet concept: If an Ethernet switch has no switching/forwarding table entry for a given MAC, does it flood/broadcast BY DESIGN (e.g. to behave like a good old-fashioned Ethenet HUB) or is unicast flooding an accidental characteristic of the w