Am Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:24:42 +0100
schrieb Vincent Hoffman :
> pkgng allows signed binary packages on FreeBSD and poudriere makes
> maintaining a repo stupidly simple if that helps.
> https://glenbarber.us/2012/06/11/Maintaining-Your-Own-pkgng-Repository.html
AFAIK, it's not an X509 certificate,
pkgng allows signed binary packages on FreeBSD and poudriere makes
maintaining a repo stupidly simple if that helps.
https://glenbarber.us/2012/06/11/Maintaining-Your-Own-pkgng-Repository.html
Vince
On 15/10/2013 11:08, Jim Thompson wrote:
> Once upon a time I was the CTO of Wayport.
>
> We put
Once upon a time I was the CTO of Wayport.
We put a few ten thousand Debian machines in the world, all remote, acting as
access controllers.
Some of the other people involved now also work at Netgate.
Let's just say:
1) We are more than familiar
2) there are severe security issues with th
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
>
> But first, on the tail of the recent thread that erupted here, consider this
> backdoor that someone (?) recently (?) discovered > (?) in the firmware for
> certain D-link routers:
> http://www.devttys0.com/2013/10/reverse-engineering-a
On 10/13/13 7:03 PM, Jim Thompson wrote:
> One possible solution: signed packages, and there was a bit of
> infrastructure put in-place just prior to the 2.1 release.
> We’ve yet to accomplish the rest of this, but.. it’s coming.
>
> As always, if you have ideas(*), bring them forward.
I alrea
It occurs to me that being more ‘conversational’ with the community might be a
good thing. Describing what is happening with pfSense, and why, and engaging
the pfsense community in the process could be a good thing. My first attempt
is included herein.
But first, on the tail of the recent
