Re: [pfSense] quagga/bgp

2017-11-19 Thread Daniel
In this Case, FRR has a text box.
I will configure FRR via CLI and Post the config later to the GUI at the text 
box. This is how I will do this.
I tried it via GUI but this is wiered to configure it and a lot of “Clicking” (

Cheers

Daniel


Am 19.11.17, 05:34 schrieb "List im Auftrag von WebDawg" 
:

That is on of the things I wish they would add, a configuration
interface that has all the pfsense txt for each config file so you can
mod it manually if needed.

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Daniel  wrote:
> Ahhh that sounds cool.
> But i dont want to configure FRR via Webinterface. I want to to is via 
CLI.
> Should this be also possible?
>
> Cheers
>
> Daniel
>
> Am 17.11.17, 15:58 schrieb "Jim Pingle" :
>
> On 11/17/2017 08:29 AM, Daniel wrote:
> > I don’t want to use openBGPd and I also don’t want to use FRR 
because I am completely new in FRR.
>
> If you know quagga, you know FRR. FRR is a fork of quagga and they 
work
> nearly the same. Most people probably won't know the difference, 
except
> that FRR will probably work better.
>
> Jim P.
>
>
>
> ___
> pfSense mailing list
> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold


___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Re: [pfSense] quagga/bgp

2017-11-18 Thread WebDawg
That is on of the things I wish they would add, a configuration
interface that has all the pfsense txt for each config file so you can
mod it manually if needed.

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Daniel  wrote:
> Ahhh that sounds cool.
> But i dont want to configure FRR via Webinterface. I want to to is via CLI.
> Should this be also possible?
>
> Cheers
>
> Daniel
>
> Am 17.11.17, 15:58 schrieb "Jim Pingle" :
>
> On 11/17/2017 08:29 AM, Daniel wrote:
> > I don’t want to use openBGPd and I also don’t want to use FRR because I 
> am completely new in FRR.
>
> If you know quagga, you know FRR. FRR is a fork of quagga and they work
> nearly the same. Most people probably won't know the difference, except
> that FRR will probably work better.
>
> Jim P.
>
>
>
> ___
> pfSense mailing list
> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Re: [pfSense] quagga/bgp

2017-11-17 Thread Daniel
Ahhh that sounds cool.
But i dont want to configure FRR via Webinterface. I want to to is via CLI.
Should this be also possible?

Cheers

Daniel

Am 17.11.17, 15:58 schrieb "Jim Pingle" :

On 11/17/2017 08:29 AM, Daniel wrote:
> I don’t want to use openBGPd and I also don’t want to use FRR because I 
am completely new in FRR.

If you know quagga, you know FRR. FRR is a fork of quagga and they work
nearly the same. Most people probably won't know the difference, except
that FRR will probably work better.

Jim P.



___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Re: [pfSense] quagga/bgp

2017-11-17 Thread Jim Pingle
On 11/17/2017 08:29 AM, Daniel wrote:
> I don’t want to use openBGPd and I also don’t want to use FRR because I am 
> completely new in FRR.

If you know quagga, you know FRR. FRR is a fork of quagga and they work
nearly the same. Most people probably won't know the difference, except
that FRR will probably work better.

Jim P.
___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Re: [pfSense] quagga/bgp

2017-11-17 Thread Ivo Tonev
I'm using. There is no problems.

Em 17 de nov de 2017 11:30, "Daniel"  escreveu:

> Here this,
>
>
>
> is anyone using quagga with bgpd as a self installed package on pfsense?
>
> I don’t want to use openBGPd and I also don’t want to use FRR because I am
> completely new in FRR.
>
> My idea is to use quagga with bgpd daemon on pfsense.
>
>
>
> Is there any problems?
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
> Daniel
>
> ___
> pfSense mailing list
> https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
> Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

[pfSense] quagga/bgp

2017-11-17 Thread Daniel
Here this,

 

is anyone using quagga with bgpd as a self installed package on pfsense?

I don’t want to use openBGPd and I also don’t want to use FRR because I am 
completely new in FRR.

My idea is to use quagga with bgpd daemon on pfsense.

 

Is there any problems?

 

Cheers

 

Daniel

___
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold