When I asked Rebol Tech about tail-recursion some time ago,
that was what they told me. And that they wanted it back, too,
but only for functions that need it. So maybe we'll at some time
see a function argument [recursive], or the like,
regards,
Ingo
Those were the words of [EMAIL
Hi Gabriele,
REBOL 1.0 was tail recursive, and it was SLOW. This is because, as
Joe Marshall expalined to me, handling tail recursion is not an
easy thing to do. I'd like to see tail recursion back in REBOL,
but I'm not sure if I'd want the complexity of the interpreter to
increase. I'd prefer a
