On Jul 13, 2014, at 21:43, Lyle Giese l...@lcrcomputer.net wrote:
I have a Soekris net4801, running 2.0.2-release(i386) NanoBSD Size 512mb. It
shows 2.1.2-release is available for auto-update.
After downloading, I get an error message that the digital signature is
invalid. I have to
On 7/14/2014 6:40 AM, Renato Botelho wrote:
On Jul 13, 2014, at 21:43, Lyle Giese l...@lcrcomputer.net wrote:
I have a Soekris net4801, running 2.0.2-release(i386) NanoBSD Size 512mb.
It shows 2.1.2-release is available for auto-update.
After downloading, I get an error message that the
Using the same configuration, but excluding the ESXi host (using a physical
pfSense) it worked smoothly.
I tried to remove the VLAN ID Tag from the vSwitch, but didn't work too :/
2014-07-13 23:55 GMT-03:00 Justin Edmands shockwav...@gmail.com:
Here is some interesting info about esxi NICs
*ISSUE SOLVED!*
I use the VLAN ID in the vSwitch and took off the TAG in the pfSense (just
adding a simple interface)
Thanks for the help guys!
2014-07-14 17:43 GMT-03:00 Jonatas Baldin jonatas.bal...@gmail.com:
Using the same configuration, but excluding the ESXi host (using a
physical
Hello everyone,
First of all, please note that I have already posted the question below
on the pfSense forum (see
https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=79081.0) since about 1 week
without any reply.
Given the urgency of the matter, I decided to post to the mailing list,
hoping for some
I suspect you need to be looking not for anti-spoofing but for anti-bogon rules.
Can't remember what pfSense calls it offhand.
-Adam
On July 14, 2014 6:19:22 PM CDT, NetSys Pro netsys...@live.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
First of all, please note that I have already posted the question below
on
