Set your servername in apache/whatever, you’re all good. The servername needs
to match the cert, the IP doesn’t matter and shouldn’t be handed out anywhere.
On 2015, Mar 7, at 8:44 AM, Tim Hogan t...@hoganzoo.com wrote:
Ed,
I like your idea with using 1:1 NAT but just one question; If
Ed,
I like your idea with using 1:1 NAT but just one question; If you use
SSL with the certificate on the web server, will the 1:1 NAT mess with that?
Regards,
Tim
On 3/6/2015 9:52 PM, ED Fochler wrote:
Bridging will disable firewall and DHCP on modem, this should be expected.
If it
Yes, I guess I want to know if the bridge is set up correctly when one
of the interfaces in the bridge has an IP address that is being used for
the NAT address for my internal LAN.
Regards,
Tim
On 3/6/2015 3:07 PM, WebDawg wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Tim Hogan t...@hoganzoo.com
Anyone?
Bueler?
Wade Blackwell
Solutions Architect
(D) 805.457.8825
(C) 805.400.8485
(S) coc.wadeblackwell
On 6 March 2015 at 10:44, Wade Blackwell wa...@bablam.com wrote:
Good morning all,
I currently have a PF VM being used as my core L3 device for a
small site. No static
Based on what you described I'm pretty sure you missed the part that
pfsense does not support ECMP and thus will only accept a single default
kernel route. In other words it cant be done and to be honest a single
pfsense receiving 2 default routes does not give you any redundancy except
2
On Sun 08 Mar 2015 02:44:45 NZDT +1300, Tim Hogan wrote:
I like your idea with using 1:1 NAT but just one question; If you
use SSL with the certificate on the web server, will the 1:1 NAT
mess with that?
No.
Volker
--
Volker Kuhlmann is list0570 with the domain in header.
