Pol Hallen wrote on Mon, Mar 23 2015 at 5:09 am:
adsl -- server1 -- WAN pfsense (2 NICs) LAN -- internal lan
(I known that pfsense should be after adsl modem)
does ipsense runs correctly with this configuration?
WAN to server1
LAN1 to internal lan
or I must add a third NIC and
On 03/22/2015 12:38 AM, Bryan D. wrote:
We've had a pfSense-to-pfSense always on IPsec VPN connecting 2 offices since
2008 (pfSense 1.2 IIRC) and it's:
- been ultra reliable (if VPN is down, suspect ISP issue or pfSense box failure)
- it's been quick to connect (about 1 second, almost
Hi all :-)
my lan (for purpose testing):
adsl -- server1 -- WAN pfsense (2 NICs) LAN -- internal lan
(I known that pfsense should be after adsl modem)
does ipsense runs correctly with this configuration?
WAN to server1
LAN1 to internal lan
or I must add a third NIC and connect LAN1 to
I am having issues as well. 2.0.0 -- 2.0.3 works fine. Upgraded to 2.2.1
and the connection always fails within 24 hours.
Please let me know how the 2.2.1 x 5 setup works.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Jeremy Bennett jbenn...@hikitechnology.com
wrote:
Yes. I have 5 sites (of various 2.0+
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Gregory K Shenaut
gkshen...@ucdavis.edu wrote:
Hi, I have a system with two sites. One of the sites has two WAN connections,
the other one. I have an IPSEC tunnel passing all traffic between the two
sites. I'm having some difficulty with site-to-site access.
FWIW, since my original report, I've noticed some other things:
- since it's not yet deployed, the v2.2.1 (at both ends) site-to-site IPsec
VPN has only 1 laptop and 1 wireless access point on the LAN and virtually
nothing else happening on the WAN (it's tied to a cable modem)
- the condition,
There's nothing to go on to offer any worthwhile suggestions. IPsec
logs best place to start.
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Bryan D. pfse...@derman.com wrote:
FWIW, since my original report, I've noticed some other things:
- since it's not yet deployed, the v2.2.1 (at both ends)
On 2015-Mar-23, at 5:24 PM, Chris Buechler c...@pfsense.com wrote:
There's nothing to go on to offer any worthwhile suggestions. IPsec
logs best place to start.
If you can be more specific, I'll try to help. Sorry, but I don't have enough
background with IPsec to ferret things out on my
I am not sure this is related but it is weird/bad...I got around to
setting the skew back to 0 for all CARP IPs on router1. pfSense (2.2.1) syncs
the change to router2 so those skews change from 101 to 100. However
afterwards router1 shows all five as Status of Master, and router2
On Mar 23, 2015, at 17:31 , Chris Buechler c...@pfsense.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Gregory K Shenaut
gkshen...@ucdavis.edu wrote:
Hi, I have a system with two sites. One of the sites has two WAN
connections, the other one. I have an IPSEC tunnel passing all traffic
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Jean-Stéfane Bergeron j...@jsbergeron.ca
wrote:
I'm on the road for another two weeks - is there anyway I can re-enable my
lan or connect to my router remotely to restore access? Or am I pooched until
I can get back to my router physically?
Without one of
Good evening everyone,
I ran into a problem with my pfsense install today. I'm connecting remotely
over a VPN connection to my network. For some reason, all my local devices
became inaccessible today.
My VPN connection still can connect to my network. When I logged into my
router, I noticed
12 matches
Mail list logo
